Skip to content

· Private foundation

Huynh & Phan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$69kPhilanthropy$30kInternational$13kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$2kEducation$2kPublic Benefit$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$584
Median grant
6
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai$24,000
Doctors Without Border$4,000
LHC Mission of Love$4,000
St Joseph The Worker Church$3,100
Quan Am Buddhist Meditation$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,331
Individual grant recipient$2,239
Vietnam Sister Support Association$2,000
Franciscan Charity$2,000
Teresa Charities$1,000
Tinh That A Di Da - Buddhist Temple$700
Individual grant recipient$646
Individual grant recipient$584
Individual grant recipient$569
Unicef USA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 39% of grant dollars ($82k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 61% that went abroad ($126k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VN HELP: $918 → 8%Teresa Charities: $1k → 12%VN HELP: $900 → 8%Teresa Charities: $1k → 12%VN HELP: $900 → 8%Teresa Charities: $1k → 12%Teresa Charities: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
IA
CA
MO
MD
MS
AL

Beyond the US: 61% of all-years giving ($126k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Vietnam$72k · 7 grants
Afghanistan$39k · 9 grants
France$6k · 7 grants
Germany$6k · 2 grants
Italy$5k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 23 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
18

Total granted

$168k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+23%

Still filing today

22%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai
    2× · 2024–2025 · $44k
  • CV
    CLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai - VN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $35k
  • TG
    Toa Giam Muc Giao Phan Ha Tinh
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • LM
    LHC Ministries - Los Angeles
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • AM
    Albertus Magnus Church - Langen
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MA
    Mai Am Tinh Me
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lovers of the Holy Cross of Nha Trang
Education
2
Vn Saint Vincent Mission Support

To provide spiritual and financial support to the Saint Vincent DePaul Missionary Congregation in Vietnam in their mission and to help the sick, the poor, the orphan, the needy and the disadvantaged

International
3
Khat Vong Song

The Vietnamese Social Ministry support the needy and ease their burden. to reach out all the pregnant women who need help and prevent abortion in Viet Nam, Also help to bury all unborn child in Viet Nam

Human Services
4
Universal Virtue Buddhist Charities

Provide monetary support to disadvantage people in vietnam and other country

Philanthropy
5
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
6
United Buddhist Foundation

1. Our website is continually updated with modern technology and provides tools to support Buddhist study and research. All of our sutra translations are freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection. 2. The Buddhist books for…

Religion
7
Hoi Bao Tro On Thien Trieu Giao Phan Da Nang

Support Diocese of Da Nang City for Vocation Priesthood

Religion
8
Vietnamese American Good Samaritan

Charities

Human Services
9
Truyen Thong Chua Cuu the Vietnam

Provide news, television and radio programs with information related to religion, education, art, music, and health care,all available online for everyone free of charge

Arts & Culture
10
Lovingkindness Vietnam

Humanitarian aid for orphanages.

International
11
The Vietnamese Buddhist Congregation

Buddhist temple used for various religious services

—
12
Vietnamese Franciscan Vocation & Mission

To assist Vietnamese Franciscan Friars (OFM) in promoting the evangelization and charity mission of St Francis of Assisi in Vietnam.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vn Sisters Support Association; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai: $44,000 · OtherCLB Vong Tay Nhan AiCLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai - VN: $35,000 · OtherCLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai - VNToa Giam Muc Giao Phan Ha Tinh: $15,000 · OtherToa Giam Muc Giao Phan Ha TinhSt Joseph The Worker Church: $10,500 · OtherSt Joseph The Worker ChurchLHC MISSION OF LOVE: $9,000 · OtherDoctors Without Border: $8,450 · OtherFranciscan Charity: $6,500 · OtherLHC Ministries - Los Angeles: $6,000 · Other+36 more: $45,425 · Other+36 moreQUAN AM BUDDHIST MEDITATION: $11,900 · ReligionVN SISTERS SUPPORT ASSOCIATION: $1,550 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionTeresa Charities Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesVietnam Health Education & Literature Projects: $2,718 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesORANGE COUNTY VIETNAM CATHOLIC MISSION: $6,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,400 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 · Health
Other$179,875Religion$13,550Human Services$6,918Education$6,200International$1,400Health$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORANGE COUNTY VIETNAM CATHOLIC MISSION: $6,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTeresa Charities Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVietnam Health Education & Literature Projects: $2,718 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVN SISTERS SUPPORT ASSOCIATION: $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUAN AM BUDDHIST MEDITATION ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY VIETNAM CATHOLIC MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Teresa Charities Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vietnam Health Education & Literature Projects ↗
  • Who funds VN SISTERS SUPPORT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huynh & Phan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huynh & Phan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huynh & Phan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph