· Private foundation
Huynh & Phan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai | $24,000 |
| LHC Mission of Love | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| St Joseph The Worker Church | $3,100 |
| Quan Am Buddhist Meditation | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,331 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,239 |
| Franciscan Charity | $2,000 |
| Vietnam Sister Support Association | $2,000 |
| Teresa Charities | $1,000 |
| Tinh That A Di Da - Buddhist Temple | $700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $646 |
| Individual grant recipient | $584 |
| Individual grant recipient | $569 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 39% of grant dollars ($82k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 61% that went abroad ($126k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 61% of all-years giving ($126k)
5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai2× · 2024–2025 · $44k
- CVCLB Vong Tay Nhan Ai - VN2× · 2022–2023 · $35k
- TGToa Giam Muc Giao Phan Ha Tinh3× · 2022–2024 · $15k
Funded once
- LMLHC Ministries - Los Angelesone grant, 2022 · $6k
- AMAlbertus Magnus Church - Langenone grant, 2022 · $5k
- MAMai Am Tinh Meone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide spiritual and financial support to the Saint Vincent DePaul Missionary Congregation in Vietnam in their mission and to help the sick, the poor, the orphan, the needy and the disadvantaged
The Vietnamese Social Ministry support the needy and ease their burden. to reach out all the pregnant women who need help and prevent abortion in Viet Nam, Also help to bury all unborn child in Viet Nam
Provide monetary support to disadvantage people in vietnam and other country
1. Our website is continually updated with modern technology and provides tools to support Buddhist study and research. All of our sutra translations are freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection. 2. The Buddhist books for…
Support Diocese of Da Nang City for Vocation Priesthood
Charities
Provide news, television and radio programs with information related to religion, education, art, music, and health care,all available online for everyone free of charge
Humanitarian aid for orphanages.
Buddhist temple used for various religious services
To assist Vietnamese Franciscan Friars (OFM) in promoting the evangelization and charity mission of St Francis of Assisi in Vietnam.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vn Sisters Support Association and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Huynh & Phan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.