Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hutchins Education Foundation

Our mission statement has been amended to the following: The Hutchins Education Foundation will serve the public by supporting educational access civil rights and providing services to low-income or disabled individuals.

$143k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$135k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Hutchins Education Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’25
4
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2025 to 2026.

Philanthropy$409kHousing & Shelter$7kEducation$2kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$1kCrime & Legal$1kHealth$1k
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
$1,011
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Philanthropic Trust$135,394
CU at Home$5,000
Free Law Project$1,011
Individual grant recipient$1,000
North Central College$258
Wikimedia Foundation$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 2% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%National Philanthropic Trust: $273k → 7%Free Law Project: $1k → 10%Wikimedia Foundation: $250 → 10%North Central College: $1k → 7%Champaign County Healthcare Consumers: $1k → 19%National Philanthropic Trust: $135k → 7%North Central College: $258 → 7%University of Illinois Foundation: $500 → 19%Eastern Illinois Foodbank: $1k → 19%Restoration Urban: $1k → 19%Restoration Urban: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 3 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$10k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    C-U AT HOME
    2× · 2025–2026 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2025–2026 · $2k
  • NC
    North Central College
    2× · 2025–2026 · $1k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • EI
    EASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    CHAMPAIGN COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSUMERS
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    one grant, 2025 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
The Civic Federation

The civic federation provides objective research and recommendations to improve government efficiency, transparency and accountability and to educate policymakers and the public.

—
11
Indiana Civil Liberties Union of Indiana Inc

To defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the constitution and laws of the united states guarantee everyone in this country.

—
12
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Free Law Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $408,575 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTC-U AT HOME: $7,000 · Human ServicesNorth Central College: $1,258 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $500 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $250 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $1,223 · Food & NutritionFree Law Project: $1,011 · Crime & LegalCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSUMERS: $1,000 · Health
Philanthropy$408,575Human Services$7,000Education$2,008Other$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,223Crime & Legal$1,011Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $408,575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetC-U AT HOME: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Central College: $1,258 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $1,223 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSUMERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutchins Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutchins Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hutchins Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hutchins Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hutchins Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph