Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hussman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$754k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$411k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$2.7MInternational$1.8MHousing & Shelter$607k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
  • $250k+2 grants · $720k
$309,015
Median grant
3
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Partners Asia$411,226
Carter Center$309,015
Light House Inc$33,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Partners Asia: $411k → 10%Carter Plains Foundation Inc: $288k → 14%Cure Violence Global: $25k → 14%Hussman Institute for Autism Inc: $1.9M → 6%The Light House Inc: $135k → 6%Autism Society of America: $113k → 8%University of Maryland: $27k → 11%Partners Asia: $318k → 10%Carter Plains Foundation Inc: $100k → 14%Howard County Autism Society: $30k → 6%The Light House Inc: $50k → 6%Autism Society of America: $100k → 8%Partners Asia: $237k → 10%Carter Center: $309k → 14%Autism Society Maryland: $19k → 6%Light House Inc: $34k → 6%Autism Society of America: $100k → 8%Partners Asia: $237k → 10%Howard County Autism Society: $15k → 6%Anne Arundel Medical Center Foundat: $6k → 6%Autism Society of America: $11k → 8%Partners Asia: $233k → 10%Howard County Autism Society: $4k → 6%Hospice of the Chesapeake: $230k → 6%Hospice of the Chesapeake: $200k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Hussman Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hussman Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 6 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+6%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $309k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    Partners Asia
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.4M · revenue 0%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $430k · revenue +31%
  • CP
    CARTERS PLAINS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $388k · revenue -43% · 86% of their budget

Funded once

  • HI
    Hussman Institute for Autism Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $1.9M · revenue -79% · 81% of their budget
  • UO
    University of Maryland
    one grant, 2021 · $27k
  • CV
    CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
2
Hosemann Family Autism Foundation
Education
3
Heal Traumas International Inc

Heal Ukraine Trauma (HUT) is the first initiative of Heal Traumas International, Inc., a mental health non-profit founded in 2022. Our mission is to help Ukrainians heal from the trauma of war so they can live fulfilling, productive lives.

Health
4
Center for Survivors of Torture

Center for Survivors of Torture provides culturally competent services that foster hope, health, and healing.

International
5
Hospital for Special Care

Hospital for Special Care is a 236-Bed Rehabilitation and Chronic Disease hospital, serving patients in these primary areas: Inpatient and Outpatient Rehabilitation.

Health
6
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
7
Harry R Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology

The Center brings together diverse interests from the agricultural, forestry, and environmental communities for the purpose of retaining Maryland's working landscapes and the industries they support while protecting and improving the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Rehab Jv Llc

Sheltering arms institute (sai) was created as a collaboration by sheltering arms hospital and vcu health to reinvent rehabilitation for life beyond limits.as a national leader in rehabilitation medicine, sai delivers personalized care in…

Health
9
Housing Unlimited Inc

Housing unlimited, inc. is a non-profit dedicated to providing affordable, permanent housing opportunities and independent living for adults in mental health recovery.

Housing & Shelter
10
Ventures Atl Inc

Operate nonprofit which trains and employs adults with autism and related developmental differences

Human Services
11
Humanas Inc
—
12
Partners in Care Maryland Inc

Partners in care, inc is dedicated to helping older adults live independently in their own homes and remain actively engaged in their communities.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Carter Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hussman Institute for Autism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hussman Institute for Autism Inc: $1,850,000 · HealthHussman Institute for Autism IncAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC: $67,040 · HealthPartners Asia: $1,436,195 · Arts & CulturePartners AsiaHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $430,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE CH…Autism Society of America: $324,214 · OtherAutism Society of…University of Maryland: $27,113 · Other+1 more: $6,000 · OtherCARTERS PLAINS FOUNDATION INC: $388,400 · Housing & ShelterCARTERS PLAIN…THE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $218,700 · Housing & ShelterTHE LIGHT HOU…THE CARTER CENTER INC: $309,015 · InternationalCURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $25,000 · International
Health$1,917,040Arts & Culture$1,436,195Other$787,327Housing & Shelter$607,100International$334,015

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHussman Institute for Autism Inc: $1,850,000 over 1y, 81% of budgetPartners Asia: $1,436,195 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $430,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCARTERS PLAINS FOUNDATION INC: $388,400 over 2y, 86% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $218,700 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC: $67,040 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetCURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hussman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hussman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • Autism Society of Maryland Inc: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hussman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hussman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hussman’s filings →

More from the funding graph