How much does Huron County Community Foundation give?

Huron County Community Foundation reported 9 itemized grants totaling $91,484, out of $167,478 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 8 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.

What does Huron County Community Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Community Improvement (54%), Education (22%), Recreation & Sports (8%).

Who are Huron County Community Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Western Reserve Local Schools ($32k), Village of New London ($30k), Norwalk City School District ($28k).

Does Huron County Community Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Huron County Community Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation, The Twenty First Century Foundation, Geotrac Charitable Foundation.

Where is Huron County Community Foundation based?

Huron County Community Foundation is based in OH.

Huron County Community Foundation

Huron County Community Foundation at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Huron County Community Foundation

The mission of the HURON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is to provide for the enrichment of the quality life in huron county by developing a permanent endowment to assess and respond to changing community needs and by serving as a charitable mechanism for donors of all levels of charitable giving.

$167k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$17k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Community Improvement$204kEducation$84kRecreation & Sports$30kArts & Culture$28kPhilanthropy$17kAnimals$8kFood & Nutrition$6kHuman Services$5k

02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 9 grants below total $91,484, the rows itemized in this filing. The $167,478 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $75,994 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $37k
$10k–50k4 grants · $54k

$9,056

Median grant

States reached

$9.4M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
VILLAGE OF NEW LONDON	$17,274
WESTERN RESERVE LOCAL SCHOOLS	$16,381
NEW LONDON LOCAL SCHOOLS	$10,807
NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND	$10,000
FIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY	$9,056
HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY	$8,128
SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOLS	$6,963
NORWALK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT	$6,875
THE SALVATION ARMY NORWALK CORPS	$6,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$345k · 7 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$345k

$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+245%

Still filing today

29%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

VO
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
2× · 2021–2022 · $204k
WR
WESTERN RESERVE LOCAL SCHOOLS
2× · 2023–2024 · $32k
VO
VILLAGE OF NEW LONDON
2× · 2023–2024 · $30k

Funded once

NA
NORWALK ARTS CENTER LLCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +245%
AT
ANSWERING THE CALL TOGETHER INC
one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -34%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

5/5

Grantees still filing

2/5

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$330,743Arts & Culture$21,528Philanthropy$16,500Animals$8,128Human Services$5,028

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Price-Downey-Buckland FoundationOH15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation · The Twenty First Century Foundation · Geotrac Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huron County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huron County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Huron County Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Huron County Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Huron County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home