Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hurlburt Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$38kHealth$26kArts & Culture$14kHousing & Shelter$13kYouth Development$10kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$257k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD NEWS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$5,000
OPTIONS FOR WOMEN PREGNANCY HELP CL$3,000
CITY POINT CHURCH INC$2,500
THE ROCK OF WINTER HAVEN$2,500
ACADEMY PREP CENTER$500
GOSPEL INC$500
HELP OF FORT MEADE$500
MULBERRY COMMUNITY CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELP OF FORT MEADE: $500 → 16%HELP OF FORT MEADE: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Hurlburt Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 72%.

Hurlburt Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 12 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$77k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+31%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GOSPEL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +328%
  • GC
    Geneva Classical Academy Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +57%
  • AW
    A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $2k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • CT
    CALVARY TEMPLE ASSEMBLY OF GOD
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LK
    LAKELAND KIWANIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -49%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN PLANT CITY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choices Medical Center

Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions

Human Services
2
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
3
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
4
Grace Classical Academy of Ocala Inc

To establish and operate a Classical Christian School dedicated to advancing charitable, religious, and educational purposes, fostering academic excellence and spiritual growth in accordance with Christian principles.

Education
5
Greater Hope Christian Church Inc

Religouse order, church corporation reg. in state of florida

Religion
6
Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc

Offer pregnancy test, abstinence programs , post-abortion bible studies, assistance with material need, first trimester ultrasounds, mens mentoring program, parenting classes.services are free and confidential with focus in wayne co oh…

Health
7
Cornerstone Ministry Village Inc

Cornerstone Ministry Village is primarily a people resource, seeking to strengthen and support families by providing compassion, counsel, encouragement, and empathy. Their mission is to provide spiritual, emotional, and physical resources…

—
8
Gospel Perfecting Center

This organization is organized for exclusively religious, charitable, educational and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

Education
9
Informed Choices

To provide a gospel centered approach to empower individuals to make informed pregnancy and sexual health choices.

Health
10
Options a Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

The organization strives to offer hope, help, and healing to women facing an unplanned pregnancy.

—
11
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
12
Christ Apostolic Church of Orlando Inc

Christian church. teaching christian values.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Help of Fort Meade Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Woman's Choice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPTIONS FOR WOMEN PREGNANCY HELP CL: $19,104 · OtherOPTIONS FOR WOMEN PREGNANCY HELP CLIndividual grant recipient: $15,105 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ROCK OF WINTER HAVEN: $12,380 · OtherTHE ROCK OF WINTER HAVENFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF MIDWAY: $8,850 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF MIDWAYCALVARY TEMPLE ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $5,000 · OtherGOOD NEWS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,755 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CENTER PC: $4,575 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN PLANT CITY: $4,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $4,000 · Other+7 more: $11,500 · Other+7 moreLAKELAND KIWANIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementGOSPEL INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesHELP OF FORT MEADE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGeneva Classical Academy Inc: $3,000 · EducationRevive Worldwide Inc: $2,500 · InternationalA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC: $2,100 · HealthLAKELAND CHORAL SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture7117 MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$94,269Community Improvement$5,000Human Services$5,000Education$3,000International$2,500Health$2,100Arts & Culture$1,500Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKELAND KIWANIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGOSPEL INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGeneva Classical Academy Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRevive Worldwide Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC: $2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHELP OF FORT MEADE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget7117 MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKELAND KIWANIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Geneva Classical Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Revive Worldwide Inc ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND CHORAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF FORT MEADE INC ↗
  • Who funds 7117 MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Givewell Community Foundation IncFL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Givewell Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Florida Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hurlburt Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hurlburt Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hurlburt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph