Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hunter Pryor Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$91kEducation$51kHealth$40kHuman Services$28kYouth Development$15kCrime & Legal$12kPublic Benefit$11kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,880
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANCER AWARENESS THROUGH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AS$25,000
ECCLESIA CAVE CREEK$20,000
TURNING POINT USA INC$10,880
WESTERN MENNONITE SCHOOL$10,000
FATHERS HEART MINISTRIES SSM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $15k → 14%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 3 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$143k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+28%

Still filing today

67%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ECCLESIA CAVE CREEK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $81k
  • CA
    CANCER AWARENESS THROUGH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CARE
    2× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue -10%
  • FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • MC
    MOSIER COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • RC
    RIVIERA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IR
    ISAAC'S ROOMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +125%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waldorf School of Bend

Waldorf school of bend is a private school. the waldorf school of bend cultivates academic excellence through our experimental curriculum rich in the arts, sciences, and practical works. we honor each child's unique spirit by building…

Education
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Westside School

Westside students learn to think critically and act with compassion in a joyful, supportive community.

Education
4
Oak Hill School

The mission of oak hill school is to provide the best pre-kindergarten through 8th grade education, creating caring and responsible critical thinkers.

—
5
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
6
Cascades Academy of Central Oregon

Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.

Education
7
Edison High School

Edison high school empowers students with learning differences to experience academic success and personal growth, while preparing them for a productive future.

—
8
Explorer West an Independent Middle School

We empower young people to explore and grow their unique intellectual, ethical, and creative capabilities, and to treasure diversity and growth in others.

Education
9
The Dome School

Teaching whole child using thematic curriculum, conflict resolution,self esteem, non-violent solutions to problems. bringing community sogether socially, serving nutritious meals.

—
10
Gould Academy

Gould academy guides students to be creative, courageous and resilient and to lead lives of fulfillment and purpose.

Education
11
Cornerstone Christian School

The school provides a biblically sound education program of high academic standards in a loving environment that meets the need of the whole child: spiritually, academically, physically, and socially.

—
12
Grace Alliance Christian School

We intend to focus with grace on the building of individual strengths in students, teaching and imparting strategies, tools and skills, in order to create lifelong learners.we will meet students and families where they are at in life and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mosier Community School Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECCLESIA CAVE CREEK: $81,000 · OtherECCLESIA CAVE CREEKRIVIERA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherRIVIERA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INCTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,880 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCFATHERS HEART MINISTRIES SSM: $10,000 · OtherFATHERS HEART MINISTRIES SSMWESTERN MENNONITE SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherWESTERN MENNONITE SCHOOLR Gibson: $6,500 · OtherR Adams: $6,500 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherCANCER AWARENESS THROUGH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CARE: $40,000 · HealthCANCER AWARENESS …FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $21,600 · Human ServicesFAMILY BU…MOSIER COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureISAAC'S ROOM: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGUARDIAN GROUP: $11,500 · Crime & LegalOREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsWILSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 · Education
Other$146,880Health$40,000Human Services$21,600Arts & Culture$20,000Youth Development$15,000Crime & Legal$11,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER AWARENESS THROUGH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CARE: $40,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $21,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOSIER COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetISAAC'S ROOM: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGUARDIAN GROUP: $11,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWILSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Autzen FoundationOR13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hunter Pryor Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hunter Pryor Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Mosier Community School Foundation Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Isaac's Room: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hunter Pryor Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph