· Private foundation
Hunter Matthew & Mildred Char Ta
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of HUNTER MATTHEW & MILDRED CHAR TA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| FAITH LUTHERAN SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER | $20,000 |
| SUMTER YOUTH CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $67k · revenue +410%
- SYSUMTER YOUTH CENTER INC4× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +6%
- CCChristian Care Center Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- CFCENTRAL FLORIDA YMCAone grant, 2018 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $8k
- SISUNRISEARC INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The scarc, inc. evaluation, training and emplyment center provides therapeutic work, supported independent living, adult basic education, socialization opportunities, and transportation to adults who are developmentally disabled and who…
To empower people with disabilities to lead self-directed lives as valued members of the community.
Assist disabled individuals in finding and keeping employment.
The mission of the florida center for the blind is to foster hope, confidence and independence in individuals with visual impairments; and to educate the community about preventing vision loss.
Jones Alternative provides Therapeutic Residential Group Home services to female victims ofsexual trauma, including molestation, rape, incest, and human trafficking, who are underthe care of the Florida Department of Children and Families…
Through empathetic compassion, we ae committed to connecting individuals and families to resources that offer multiple pathways to long-term, sustainable recovery.
Ability 1st, the center for independent living of north florida, is a community-based, organization that provides services to persons with varying disabilities. our mission is to empower people with disabilities to live independently and…
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
Provide guardian and guardianship services to indigent and developmentally disabled citizens with no family or friends to make medical or financial decisions for them in citrus, hernando, lake, sumter and marion counties.
The Organization's mission is to empower families in making their transition from homelessness to sustainable independence.
Supporting recovery, promoting health, and creating hope.
Hope Services, Incorporated is an organization established to assist in transitioning disabled individuals into employable individuals and helping place them into jobs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mercy Flight Se Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUMTER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Mercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Lake Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISEARC INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VISION FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS FLORIDA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dorothy B C Steves Char Ta · Barry C Warren Fdn Ta · Hans and Cay Jacobsen Charitable Foundat · Mount Dora Community Trust · Williams M M & R P Fdn Ta · United Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc · Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta · Parker Irma & Orville Ch Tr Ta · Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta · Charles B & Mary M McLin Foundation · William M and Marian R Haywood Charitable Trust · Dr Harry J Heeb Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hunter Matthew & Mildred Char Ta funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Flight Se Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.