· Private foundation
Hunter Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MARTIN COUNTY | $50,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| LOBLOLLY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,725 |
| THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FIT KIDS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC - MARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC | $6,000 |
| LAKE MINNETONKA GARDEN CLUB | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSITUTE OF ART | $1,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES | $1,500 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MINNESOTA | $1,500 |
| HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST | $1,000 |
| HOBE SOUND NATURE CENTER | $1,000 |
| JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 28% of Hunter Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION6× · 2019–2024 · $222k · revenue +10%- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +74%
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +226%
Funded once
- MHMARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $10k
- SJST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALone grant, 2021 · $10k
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +112%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…
To protect georgia through ecological and economic solutions for stewardship, conservation, and sustainable use of the land and its resources.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…
Our purpose is to protect and preserve the charlotte harbor/pine island sound estuary system. the culturally and economically important fishery that depends upon this ecosystem is under threat, and new conservation measures are urgently…
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Conservation florida's mission is to permanently protect florida's water, wildlife, and wild places - the places that make florida home.
Gfa works in partnership with and on behalf of the greater farallones and cordell bank national marine sanctuaries to preserve, monitor, research, educate about and enhance these invaluable marine resources.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lake Minnetonka Garden Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOBLOLLY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE MINNETONKA GARDEN CLUB ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STRIPPING FOR A CURE ↗
- Who funds THE GUARDIANS OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JUPITER ISLAND GARDEN CLUBINC ↗
- Who funds Florida Wildlife Federation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Clair Charitable Trust · Stephanie & Lawrence Flinn Jrcharitable Trust · George H Shattuckjr and Isabel C Shattuck Charitable Foundation · The David and Elizabeth Long Foundation · The James E & Constance L Bell Foundation · Donald Grant & Ann Martin Calder Foundat · Legatus Foundation · Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane · CMB Foundation · Madigan Family Foundation · Scott Family Foundation · Ethel D Colket Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hunter Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.