How much did HUNGER TASK FORCE INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of HUNGER TASK FORCE INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

coagrowthriverwestsherman parkneighborhoodjewishsocial

2021

neighborhoodbuildjewishsocialmeetadvocacysalvation army

2022

jewishsocialhomelessadvocacyoutreachchurchmeet

2023

buildjewishchurchsocialhomelessoutreachadvocacy

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $14k
$10k–50k11 grants · $161k

$11,748

Median grant

States reached

$42M

Total assets

Largest grants

HUNGER TASK FORCE LA CROSSE (CSFP)$25,000
ST BENEDICT COMMUNITY MEAL$19,795
HOUSE OF PEACE$15,097
KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$14,279
ST VINCENT DE PAUL MEAL PROG$13,952
CENTER FOR VETERANS ISSUES$13,799
GATHERING OF SE WISCONSIN$12,266
INTERCHANGE INC$11,969
FOOD PANTRY OF WAUKESHA COUNT$11,748
OPEN DOOR CAFE MEAL PROGRAM$11,400
ST JOSEPH FOOD PANTRY$11,344
PROJECT CONCERN OF CUDAHY$2,139
SOUTH MILW HUMAN CONCERNS$2,098
JIM LUTHER NEW HOPE CENTER$2,031
MUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY$2,021

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.3M · 51 repeat orgs$523k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

51 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.3M

$523k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+52%

Still filing today

57%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Cathedral Center Shelter
7× · 2018–2024 · $308k · revenue +83%
SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE
7× · 2018–2024 · $284k · revenue +17%
SVDP - ST MATTHIAS
7× · 2018–2024 · $273k · revenue +55%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF MILWAUKEE
one grant, 2020 · $285k
MC
MILWAUKEE COUNTY
one grant, 2020 · $170k
Hope House of Milwaukee Inc
7× · 2018–2024 · $19k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Saukville Community Food Pantry Inc

Community Food Pantry. Provide emergency food assistance nutritious food and basic need toiletries to prent food insecurity and assist disadvantaged families in Ozaukee County. We all provide assistant with school supplies community meals…

Food & Nutrition

Feed My People Inc

To eliminate hunger by distributing food and household products to food pantries, community meal sites, and other programs serving low income people in 14 counties in west central wisconsin.

—

Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…

—

Feeding Wisconsin Inc

Our vision is a hunger-free wisconsin and our mission is to help our food banks and partners fight hunger, improve health and strengthen local communities so that everybody in wisconsin has access to the food and benefits they need to…

Food & Nutrition

Kinship Mke Inc

Kinship Community Food Center engages volunteers and neighborhood residents to end hunger, isolation, and poverty. Our innovative programs nourish food security and wellness, foster belonging and community engagement, and empower stability…

Food & Nutrition

Interfaith Food Pantry of Portage

The mission is to provide a non denominational food pantry that serves those in need in portage county wisconsin by providing food and other usable household supplies.

Food & Nutrition

Coralville Community Food Pantry

The Coralville Community Food Pantry is an anti-hunger nonprofit organization providing critical and innovative food assistance services to the greater Coralville community.

Food & Nutrition

Sun Prairie Emergency Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & personal care items to families in need.

—

Peters Pantry Inc

Through the help of many businesses, volunteers and donors peter's pantry collects and distributes donated food to those in need in manitowoc county

Food & Nutrition

Community Pantry

Provide emergency food, housing and utilities for people in need in the community

Human Services

Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—

Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

To help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Floing With Kindness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.7%1/142

the rest of the field

10%

987/10,128

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

88 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

85/88

Grantees still filing

71/88

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,258,430Human Services$1,191,416Housing & Shelter$549,102Food & Nutrition$462,045Religion$347,898Education$1,073

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI75.8× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Otto Bremer Trust · Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · The Ros Foundation · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HUNGER TASK FORCE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Good Samaritian Outreach Cent.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 061760787 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Good Samaritian Outreach Cent, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hunger Task Force Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hunger Task Force Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HUNGER TASK FORCE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?