Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hung Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$107kEnvironment$60kReligion$38kAnimals$34kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$6kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$556k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SHIPLEY SCHOOL$30,000
NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$15,000
NAPLES ZOO AT CARIBBEAN GARDEN$10,000
LINDA DUNN FOUNDATION$5,000
NOVA - NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE$3,125
ROOKERY BAY NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE$2,500
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NOVA - NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE: $3k → 6%LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$236k · 9 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$236k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+34%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHIPLEY SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2025 · $91k · revenue +8%
  • NB
    NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +60%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
    3× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +409%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN CHINESE MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TN
    THE NAPLES FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
2
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

3
Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc

Miami lighthouse through education, training, research, vision enhancement and as a center for learning provides hope, confidence, and independence for people of all ages. for nearly a century, miami lighthouse for the blind has been…

Human Services
4
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
5
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
6
Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc

The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…

Animals
7
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
10
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
12
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Linda Dunn Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $32,500 · OtherNAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCHNAPLES ZOO AT CARIBBEAN GARDEN — $30,000 · OtherNAPLES ZOO AT CARIBBEAN GARDENTHE AMERICAN CHINESE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN CHINESE MUSEUM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientABINGTON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL — $9,000 · OtherABINGTON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $8,500 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDATHE NAPLES FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $5,000 · Other+8 more — $12,000 · Other+8 moreSHIPLEY SCHOOL — $90,500 · EducationSHIPLEY SCHOOLHAVERFORD SCHOOL — $6,500 · EducationHAVERFORD SCHOOL+1 more — $1,000 · EducationNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $46,700 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL G…THE LINDA DUNN FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropySTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyMission Working Dogs — $5,000 · Human ServicesNetwork of Victim Assistance — $3,125 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesWGBH Educational Foundation — $5,000 · Arts & CultureHumane World for Animals Inc — $1,000 · Animals
Other$117,000Education$98,000Environment$46,700Philanthropy$11,000Human Services$9,125Arts & Culture$5,000Animals$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL — $90,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $46,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LINDA DUNN FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAVERFORD SCHOOL — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMission Working Dogs — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork of Victim Assistance — $3,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hung Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hung Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hung Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph