Skip to content

· Public charity

Human Service Charities of America Inc

The mission of human service charities of america is to help human service charities gain access to workplace campaigns and to promote donor choice, administrative efficiency, and low overhead.

$139k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Health$99kInternational$45kArts & Culture$40kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$8k
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $115,603, the rows itemized in this filing. The $138,608 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,005 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
$10,912
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$42,716
PUBLIC RADIO INTERNATIONAL$19,502
MAZON A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER$18,697
A CHILD'S FEEDING FUND$10,912
CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES$10,184
ADOPT AMERICA NETWORK$7,641
CHILDREN'S CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND$5,951
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADOPT AMERICA NETWORK: $8k → 18%A CHILD'S FEEDING FUND: $16k → 11%A CHILD'S FEEDING FUND: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 4 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$180k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-18%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $74k · revenue +3%
  • PR
    Public Radio International Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $40k · revenue -98%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    2× · 2019–2021 · $40k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • AC
    A CHILDS LIFE SAVED
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • TB
    The Breast Cancer Charities of America
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
  • LC
    Lions Clubs International Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
2
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
3
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

ACF is dedicated to supporting and increasing philanthropy by making grants to tax exempt organizations for their charitable, educational, scientific, literary or other 501c3 activities; promoting donor education and engagement, and civic…

Philanthropy
4
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
5
American Culinary Federation Inc

Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession

—
6
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
7
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
8
National Pediatric Cancer Foundation Inc

National pediatric cancer foundation (npcf) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to funding research to eliminate childhood cancer. our focus is to fund research to find less toxic, more targeted therapies by partnering with leading…

Health
9
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
10
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The National Children's Cancer Society; the most unlike its peers is Mazon a Jewish Response to Hunger. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $39,668 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to HungerA CHILDS LIFE SAVED: $11,981 · OtherA CHILDS LIFE SAVEDCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES: $10,184 · OtherCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIESThe Breast Cancer Charities of America: $9,266 · OtherThe Breast Cancer Charities of Americ…THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $5,951 · OtherTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIET…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $73,529 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREV…Public Radio International Inc: $39,753 · Arts & CulturePublic Radio Intern…A Childs' Feeding Fund: $26,576 · Human ServicesA Childs' Feedin…ADOPT AMERICA NETWORK: $7,641 · Human ServicesADOPT AMERICA NE…Lions Clubs International Foundation: $5,999 · Philanthropy
Other$77,050Health$73,529Arts & Culture$39,753Human Services$34,217Philanthropy$5,999

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $73,529 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPublic Radio International Inc: $39,753 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $39,668 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES: $10,184 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADOPT AMERICA NETWORK: $7,641 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation: $5,999 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $5,951 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Human Service Charities of America Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Human Service Charities of America Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Human Service Charities of America Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Human Service Charities of America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Human Service Charities of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph