Skip to content
Hulburt Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hulburt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$158kHuman Services$42kRecreation & Sports$23kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$3kAnimals$2kEducation$98Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$225k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Angel Wings Foundation$11,000
DIERINGER FOUNDATION$4,151
To Friends of Odyssey$3,000
American Heart Association$309
North Tapps Legacy Lacrosse$206
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Angel Wings Foundation: $11k → 9%ANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%Angel Wings Foundation: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 6 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$179k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $94k · revenue -9%
  • MG
    MULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $50k
  • AW
    ANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue -58%

Funded once

  • PM
    PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • LY
    LEGACY YOUTH LACROSSE CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • LR
    LILLIE RICE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
5
American College of Chest Physicians

To champion the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chest diseases through education, communication, and research.

—
6
American Association of Medical Society Executives

American association of medical society executives (aamse) is committed to educating and supporting medical society professionals to advance the profession of medical society management, medical societies, and the physicians they serve.

—
7
Society for Vascular Surgery

To improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients withvascular disease by promoting clinical and basic research; providingcontinuing education; developing post-graduate training; advocating onbehalf of members; promoting the…

—
8
United States Sailing Association Inc

The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.

Recreation & Sports
9
Hawaii Medical Association

Hawaii medical association is dedicated to serving physicians, their patients and community through representation, advocacy, and public service. core activities: advocacy, education

—
10
American Association for Respiratory Care

Aarc's mission is to be the foremost professional association promoting respiratory therapists. the aarc advances professional excellence and science in the practice of repiratory therapy, serving the professional, patients, caregivers and…

—
11
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
12
American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Asps promotes the highest standards in advocacy, research, education, patient safety, and ethical standards for plastic surgery, our members, and their patients.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary Bridge Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Odyssey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $93,510 · HealthMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION+2 more: $4,344 · HealthMULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION: $50,211 · OtherMULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATIONLEGACY YOUTH LACROSSE CLUB: $10,000 · OtherLEGACY YOUTH LACROSSE CLUBLILLIE RICE CENTER: $10,000 · OtherLILLIE RICE CENTERDIERINGER FOUNDATION: $4,151 · OtherWHITE RIVER CHEER BOOSTER: $3,000 · Other+3 more: $3,812 · OtherANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION: $31,953 · Human ServicesANGEL WINGS FOU…GIG HARBOR JUNIOR SAILING: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND: $1,556 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF ODYSSEY: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,130 · AnimalsDONORSCHOOSEORG: $98 · Education
Health$107,854Other$81,174Human Services$31,953Recreation & Sports$6,556Youth Development$3,000Animals$2,130Education$98

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $93,510 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION: $31,953 over 4y, 10% of budgetPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIG HARBOR JUNIOR SAILING: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,344 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND: $1,556 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hulburt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hulburt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hulburt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home