Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hulburt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Health$158kHuman Services$42kRecreation & Sports$23kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$3kAnimals$2kEducation$98Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$225k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Angel Wings Foundation$11,000
DIERINGER FOUNDATION$4,151
To Friends of Odyssey$3,000
American Heart Association$309
North Tapps Legacy Lacrosse$206
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Angel Wings Foundation: $11k → 9%ANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%Angel Wings Foundation: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$179k · 6 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$179k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $94k · revenue -9%
  • MG
    MULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $50k
  • AW
    ANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue -58%

Funded once

  • LY
    LEGACY YOUTH LACROSSE CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • LR
    LILLIE RICE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • PM
    PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
5
American College of Chest Physicians

To champion the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chest diseases through education, communication, and research.

6
American Association of Medical Society Executives

American association of medical society executives (aamse) is committed to educating and supporting medical society professionals to advance the profession of medical society management, medical societies, and the physicians they serve.

7
Society for Vascular Surgery

To improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients withvascular disease by promoting clinical and basic research; providingcontinuing education; developing post-graduate training; advocating onbehalf of members; promoting the…

8
United States Sailing Association Inc

The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.

Recreation & Sports
9
Hawaii Medical Association

Hawaii medical association is dedicated to serving physicians, their patients and community through representation, advocacy, and public service. core activities: advocacy, education

10
American Association for Respiratory Care

Aarc's mission is to be the foremost professional association promoting respiratory therapists. the aarc advances professional excellence and science in the practice of repiratory therapy, serving the professional, patients, caregivers and…

11
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

12
American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Asps promotes the highest standards in advocacy, research, education, patient safety, and ethical standards for plastic surgery, our members, and their patients.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary Bridge Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Odyssey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $93,510 · HealthMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION+2 more — $4,344 · HealthMULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION — $50,211 · OtherMULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATIONLEGACY YOUTH LACROSSE CLUB — $10,000 · OtherLEGACY YOUTH LACROSSE CLUBLILLIE RICE CENTER — $10,000 · OtherLILLIE RICE CENTERDIERINGER FOUNDATION — $4,151 · OtherWHITE RIVER CHEER BOOSTER — $3,000 · Other+3 more — $3,812 · OtherANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION — $31,953 · Human ServicesANGEL WINGS FOU…GIG HARBOR JUNIOR SAILING — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $1,556 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF ODYSSEY — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,130 · AnimalsDONORSCHOOSEORG — $98 · Education
Health$107,854Other$81,174Human Services$31,953Recreation & Sports$6,556Youth Development$3,000Animals$2,130Education$98

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $93,510 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANGEL WINGS FOUNDATION — $31,953 over 4y, 10% of budgetPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIG HARBOR JUNIOR SAILING — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,344 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $1,556 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hulburt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph