Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hughey Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$655kHealth$50kEducation$12kInternational$11kYouth Development$4kCrime & Legal$4kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $123k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL BIBLE CHAPEL$123,432
TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS$1,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$1,000
REACH OUT CHARITIES$1,000
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$1,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REVIVE AND RESTORE: $3k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$716k · 11 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$716k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+174%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +765%
  • TG
    TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue ×23
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • EB
    EMMAUS BIBLE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • University of South Florida Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +174%
  • CM
    CHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
2
St Peter's Hospital Foundation Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. peter's hospital foundation is a member of st. peter's health…

—
3
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
4
Camillus House Inc

Rooted in the compassionate hospitality of st. john of god, we improve the quality of life of those who are vulnerable and homeless in south florida through the provision of a continuum of housing and supportive services.

—
5
Catholic Charities of Central Florida Inc

Embracing those in need with hope, transforming their lives through faith, compassion, and service.

Human Services
6
Samaritan Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. samaritan hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
7
The Methodist Hospital Foundation

Mission: this organization is part of the methodist hospital, doing business as houston methodist hospital, whose mission is: to provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a…

Health
8
St Joseph's Health Center Properties Inc

We, st. joseph's health center properties and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. joseph's health center properties is a member of st.…

Health
9
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
10
Covenant Hospital Hobbs

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
11
St Joseph's Hospital Health Center Foundation Inc

We, st. joseph's hospital health center foundation and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. joseph's hospital health center foundation is…

Health
12
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tampa General Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Revive and Restore Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL BIBLE CHAPEL INC: $643,694 · OtherCENTRAL BIBLE CHAPEL INC+12 more: $34,200 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · HealthNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $5,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 · ReligionMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesRevive and Restore Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $5,000 · EducationCompassion International Incorporated: $2,618 · InternationalCENTRAL PARK VILLAGE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $2,200 · Recreation & SportsTHE ISAACS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$677,894Health$42,000Religion$7,500Human Services$6,000Education$5,000International$2,618Recreation & Sports$2,200Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRevive and Restore Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCENTRAL PARK VILLAGE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $2,200 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE ISAACS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Revive and Restore Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK VILLAGE YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ISAACS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hughey Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hughey Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hughey Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hughey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hughey’s filings →

More from the funding graph