Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hueppchen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$15kHealth$9kRecreation & Sports$5kEducation$4kReligion$2kAnimals$1kArts & Culture$725International$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PCC$3,830
Lions Tigers Bears$2,071
ECTLC$500
St Judes$300
ASPCA$300
San Marcos Academy$275
Jeremiah Project$100
Womeans Bean Project$100
Sanke Farm$100
Tennyson Center$100
A Home Within$100
Tunnel to Towers$100
Guiding Eyes for the Blind$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%A Home Within: $100 → 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $250 → 11%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $50 → 9%Adoption Choices of CO: $750 → 7%Wounded Warrior Project: $100 → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $50 → 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 15 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$45k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+8%

Still filing today

27%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentAnimalsReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +99%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $450 · revenue +50%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $450 · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CU
    Concordia University
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • AC
    Adoption Choices Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $750 · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
2
Women's Rights Without Frontiers International

Women's rights without frontiers, international ("wrwf- or "the organization") is a nonprofit entity supporting the rights of women and girls, first in china, then in other countries' communities. the organization was founded by regina…

International
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
5
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
6
National Women's Shelter Network Inc

Our mission is to advance the status of women,youth,children and families experiencing homelessness in our country, and the womens, youth and family shelters and safe havens that serve them, and end and prevent homelessness. we do so by:…

Housing & Shelter
7
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
8
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
11
Abode Contemplative Care

Abode's mission is to teach the art of contemplative living and dying while providing a beautiful home and compassionate care for those at end of life - at no charge. abode runs completely on donations and grants. abode's vision: "we live…

Human Services
12
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Knights of Columbus Martoma Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECPCC: $13,631 · OtherECPCCLTB: $10,481 · OtherLTBLions Tigers Bears: $5,471 · OtherLions Tigers BearsHGH: $4,800 · OtherHGHPCC: $3,830 · OtherPCCConcordia University: $3,465 · OtherConcordia UniversityECTLC: $3,368 · OtherECTLCIndividual grant recipient: $2,406 · Other+23 more: $7,542 · Other+23 moreAdoption Choices Inc: $750 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $450 · Human ServicesA HOME WITHIN INC: $100 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $50 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,150 · HealthTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $450 · AnimalsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $200 · EducationWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $100 · EmploymentSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 · Religion
Other$54,994Human Services$1,350Health$1,150Animals$450Education$200Employment$100Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAdoption Choices Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $113 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS MARTOMA COUNCIL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEREMIAH PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Adoption Choices Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS MARTOMA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds A HOME WITHIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEREMIAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hueppchen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hueppchen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hueppchen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph