Skip to content
Hua and Jiang Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hua and Jiang Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Hua and Jiang Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to University Of Southern California, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Hua and Jiang Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $34k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’21
5
’22
1
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$261kHuman Services$24kArts & Culture$13kReligion$6kCommunity Improvement$4kInternational$2kHousing & Shelter$500Youth Development$440Other$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$309
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBOURS FRIENDS AND FAMILIES$20,000
XIU NING CULTURE FOUNDATION$12,500
CA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$329
WPY BSA GOLDEN GATE$309
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$250
PAYPAL GO FUND ME$200
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$120
PORTLAND JAPANESE GARDEN$110
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%East Bay SPCA: $100 → 10%PAYPAL GO FUND ME: $200 → 7%NEIGHBOURS FRIENDS AND FAMILIES: $20k → 8%XIU NING CULTURE FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%Children's Museum of Sonoma County: $195 → 9%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $440 → 10%CA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $329 → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $250 → 12%FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SG VALL: $5k → 14%UNICEF USA: $314 → 17%Odisha Society of the Americas: $2k → 6%PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $100 → 14%PORTLAND JAPANESE GARDEN: $110 → 12%university of north carolina: $61k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CH: $90k → 13%NEIGHBOURS FRIENDS AND FAMILIES: $2k → 8%SAN RAMON FC: $5k → 9%WPY BSA GOLDEN GATE: $309 → 10%SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $120 → 10%University of Southern California: $100k → 14%Financial GPS Group: $2k → 8%EBTCC: $5k → 9%Shepherd's Gate: $500 → 10%EBTCC: $4k → 9%GILEAD BIBLE CHURCH: $1k → 9%ROOMS OF HOPE INC: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
2
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
3
San Jose Children's Discovery Museum

Children's discovery museum of san jose inspires creativity, curiosity and lifelong learning.

Arts & Culture
4
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
5
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
6
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
7
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
8
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
9
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
10
National Space Society

The vision of nss is people living and working in thriving communities beyond the earth, and the use of the vast resources of space for the dramatic betterment of humanity.

—
11
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fund for Unicef; the most unlike its peers is Neighbours Friends and Families Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CH: $89,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHuniversity of north carolina: $61,000 · Otheruniversity of north carolinaEBTCC: $9,000 · Other+11 more: $14,578 · Other+11 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIANEIGHBOURS FRIENDS AND FAMILIES INC: $21,700 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBOURS F…XIU NING CULTURE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Arts & CultureXIU NING CUL…+2 more: $315 · Arts & CultureTHE ODISHA SOCIETY OF THE AMERICAS: $1,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $314 · InternationalShepherds Gate: $500 · Housing & ShelterMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $250 · AnimalsJAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON: $110 · Environment
Other$174,178Education$100,000Arts & Culture$34,515International$1,814Housing & Shelter$500Animals$250Environment$110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBOURS FRIENDS AND FAMILIES INC: $21,700 over 2y, 69% of budgetTHE ODISHA SOCIETY OF THE AMERICAS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetShepherds Gate: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023: $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $314 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $195 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOMS OF HOPE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hua and Jiang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hua and Jiang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hua and Jiang Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home