Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Howard & Dorothy Adleta Foundation Argent Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$86kAnimals$27kHuman Services$23k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION$15,109
VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC$3,000
SPCA OF TEXAS$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $3k → 11%TEXAS HEARING AND SERVICE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $1k → 11%SPCA OF TEXAS: $2k → 14%VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $3k → 11%TEXAS HEARING AND SERVICE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $1k → 11%SPCA OF TEXAS: $2k → 14%TEXAS HEARING AND SERVICE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TEXAS: $1k → 11%SPCA OF TEXAS: $2k → 14%TEXAS HEARING AND SERVICE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $1k → 11%SPCA OF TEXAS: $2k → 14%TEXAS HEARING AND SERVICE DOGS INC: $3k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $1k → 11%SPCA OF TEXAS: $2k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $1k → 11%SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $1k → 11%SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$135k · 6 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$135k
$1k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $31k · revenue +163%
  • TH
    TEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $23k · revenue +121%
  • HS
    Humane Society of North Texas
    6× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $54,723 · OtherSOUTHWEST MEDICAL FOUNDATIONTEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC — $23,000 · OtherTEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC+1 more — $1,000 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $30,882 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUN…SPCA of Texas — $14,000 · AnimalsSPCA of TexasVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $6,000 · AnimalsVESTED INTEREST IN K9…Humane Society of North Texas — $6,000 · AnimalsHumane Society of Nor…
Other$78,723Education$30,882Animals$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $30,882 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC — $23,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSPCA of Texas — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas
  • Who funds VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Howard & Dorothy Adleta Foundation Argent Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard & Dorothy Adleta Foundation Argent Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Howard & Dorothy Adleta Foundation Argent Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph