Skip to content
Housing Authority Insurance Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Housing Authority Insurance Inc

Development and marketing of risk management and insurance programs for public housing authorities.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$5.2MHealth$40kEducation$32kEmployment$5kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $1,010,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,129,249 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $119,249 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$1,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$745k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC (HTI)$1,000,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Affordable Housing Accreditation Board: $346k → 7%Philly Seeds Inc: $5k → 22%Public Housing Authorities Directors Association (PHADA): $11k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $10k → 9%Foodshare Inc: $5k → 11%HOUSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC (HTI): $1.0M → 12%Youth Employment Academy: $5k → 12%NATIONAL PUBLIC HOUSING MUSEUM: $300k → 14%International Center for Captive Insurance Education (ICCIE): $5k → 10%AffordableHousing AccreditationBoard: $204k → 7%Affordable Housing Accreditation Board: $453k → 22%Howard University: $10k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $10k → 9%PUBLIC AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESEARCH CORPORATION: $609k → 12%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CAPTIVE INSURANCE EDUCATION (ICCIE): $5k → 10%Affordable Housing Accreditation Board: $428k → 22%PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITIES DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%Make-A-Wish Foundation of Connecticut: $10k → 9%Public and Affordable Housing Research Corporation: $418k → 12%ICCIE: $5k → 10%Make-A-Wish Foundation of Connecticut: $10k → 9%AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACCREDITATION BOARD: $368k → 12%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CAPTIVE INSURANCE (ICCIE): $5k → 10%Public and Affordable Housing Research Corporation: $348k → 12%Affordable Housing Accreditation Board: $320k → 12%Public and Affordable Housing Research Corporation: $319k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 5 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$3.9M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+65%

Still filing today

80%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterEducationSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PUBLIC AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESEARCH CORP
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.7M · revenue +104% · 94% of their budget
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +15%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CAPTIVE INSURANCE EDUCATION INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • The National Public Housing Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -21%
  • THE URBAN INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $43k · revenue +51%
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
3
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
4
Housing Partnerships Inc

Housing Partnerships, Inc creates great communities through direct investments and partnerships.

Housing & Shelter
5
National Housing Conference Inc

The national housing conference has been defending the american home since 1931. we believe everyone in america should have equal opportunity to live in a quality, affordable home in a thriving community. nhc convenes and collaborates with…

Housing & Shelter
6
Partnership for Housing Affordability

In response to housing needs in our communities, we champion policies, developments, and programs for quality affordable housing in the Richmond region.

Education
7
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
8
National Council of State Housing Agencies

To advance through advocacy and education the nation's state housing finance agencies' efforts to provide affordable housing to those who need it.

—
9
Contemporary Housing Alternatives of Florida Inc

Our mission is focused on urban revitalization by providing affordable, vibrant, multi-family housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. we offer rental units throughout pinellas county at and below market rates to…

Housing & Shelter
10
The Affordable Housing Trust for Columbus and Franklin County

Facilitate and invest in developments designed to: create and preserve affordable homeownership and rental housing; strengthen and stabilize neighborhoods; support working households, seniors and special needs populations.

Housing & Shelter
11
Mutual Housing Association of Southwestern Ct Inc

The mission of the association is to develop, finance, own, lease and manage safe,quality, permanently affordable housing for low and moderate incomehouseholds throughout fairfield county, connecticut. mha seeks tocreate a continuum of…

Housing & Shelter
12
Chn Housing Partners

Chn's mission is to leverage the power of affordable housing to improve lives and communities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public and Affordable Housing Research Corp; the most unlike its peers is Affordable Housing Accreditation Board. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Affordable Housing Accreditation Board: $2,119,348 · OtherAffordable Housing Accreditation Board+3 more: $35,352 · OtherPUBLIC AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESEARCH CORP: $1,693,296 · Housing & ShelterPUBLIC AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESEAR…+1 more: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSING TELECOMMUNICA…The National Public Housing Museum: $300,000 · Arts & CultureTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $42,946 · Social ScienceMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CAPTIVE INSURANCE EDUCATION INC: $21,600 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationYOUTH EMPLOYMENT ACADEMY: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,154,700Housing & Shelter$1,698,296Community Improvement$1,000,000Arts & Culture$300,000Social Science$42,946Health$40,000Education$31,600Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAffordable Housing Accreditation Board: $2,119,348 over 6y, 100% of budgetPUBLIC AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESEARCH CORP: $1,693,296 over 4y, 94% of budgetHOUSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetThe National Public Housing Museum: $300,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $42,946 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CAPTIVE INSURANCE EDUCATION INC: $21,600 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetPUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITIES DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION: $20,602 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials: $9,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH EMPLOYMENT ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHILLY SEEDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Housing Authority Insurance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Housing Authority Insurance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Housing Authority Insurance Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Housing Authority Insurance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Housing Authority Insurance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home