Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mark D Hostetter and Alexander N Habib Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of Hostetter-Habib Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $222,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $329,750 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $107,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Ghost Ranch Foundation Inc$75,000
First Presbyterian Church$25,000
Family Equality Council$20,000
National Ghost Ranch Foundation Inc$15,000
New York Theological Seminary$10,000
Riverdale Country School Inc$10,000
National Ghost Ranch Foundation Inc$10,000
Presbyterian Church Camp and Conference Association$10,000
Skidmore College$10,000
Presbyterian Church Camp and Conference Association$7,500
Family Equality Council$5,000
Cornell University$5,000
Presbyterian Outlook Found Inc$3,000
Trustees of Princeton University$2,500
Westminster Foundation Princeton New Jersey$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Harvard College: $10k → 8%National Ghost Ranch Foundation: $35k → 16%SUMMIT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $13.4M → 11%Skidmore College: $10k → 7%Presbyterian Conference Association Inc: $726k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $25k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $51k → 28%National Ghost Ranch Foundation: $15k → 18%Presbyterian Church Camp & Conference Assn: $8k → 10%Presbyterian Church USA: $25k → 15%National Ghost Ranch Foundation: $10k → 16%SUMMIT RANCH INC: $900k → 11%Presbyterian Conference Association Inc: $424k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $25k → 17%Riverdale Country School: $50k → 28%National Ghost Ranch Foundation: $15k → 18%SUMMIT RANCH INC: $747k → 11%Presbyterian Conference Association Inc: $292k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $25k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $50k → 28%National Ghost Ranch Foundation: $10k → 18%Summit Ranch Inc: $700k → 11%Presbyterian Conference Association Inc: $23k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $25k → 17%Riverdale Country School: $15k → 28%National Ghost Ranch Foundation: $10k → 18%SUMMIT RANCH INC: $575k → 11%Presbyterian Conference Association Inc: $23k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $25k → 17%Riverdale Country School: $10k → 28%Presbyterian Conference Association Inc: $21k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $25k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $10k → 28%Presbyterian Conference Assoc Inc: $13k → 9%Family Equality Council: $31k → 17%Family Equality Council: $28k → 17%Family Equality Council: $26k → 17%Family Equality Council: $25k → 17%Family Equality Council: $25k → 17%Family Equality Council: $18k → 17%Auburn Theological Seminary: $100k → 17%Auburn Theological Seminary: $20k → 17%New York Theological Seminary: $15k → 17%AUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $13k → 17%Auburn Theological Seminary: $10k → 17%AUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10k → 17%New York Theological Seminary: $8k → 17%SEE ATTACHED LIST: $449k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
KY
NM
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 17 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$5.5M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+7%

Still filing today

59%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CultureMembership BenefitInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SUMMIT RANCH INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $2.9M · revenue +146% · 50% of their budget
  • RC
    RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $196k · revenue +37%
  • NATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $196k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SP
    SUMMIT PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $13M
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • LR
    LGBT RELIGIOUS ARCHIVES NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
The King's College

Christian college preparing students for principled leadership around the world.

Education
12
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Princeton University and the most unlike its peers is Westminster Foundation At Princeton Nj. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtqia+ Advocacy and Commu…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Youth CampsChristian Outreach Ministri…Classical Music OrchestrasCharter and Independent Sch…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr12%8%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr19%28%35–55yr15%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr16%0%20–35yr19%16%35–55yr15%82%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/27
the rest of the field
8%
819/9,945

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUMMIT PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $13,396,850 · OtherSUMMIT PREPARATORY SCHOOLSUMMIT RANCH INC — $2,924,488 · OtherSUMMIT RANCH INCPRESBYTERIAN CONFERENCE ASSOC INC — $1,522,120 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CONFERENCE ASSOC INC+20 more — $310,300 · OtherRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $196,050 · EducationFAMILY EQUALITY — $183,400 · EducationAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $152,900 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $26,000 · Education+5 more — $23,000 · EducationNATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION — $195,600 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION — $43,500 · Religion+3 more — $7,350 · ReligionTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $22,500 · Membership BenefitThe Alliance For Media Arts Culture Inc — $2,500 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $1,500 · Arts & CultureBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC — $1,200 · Youth DevelopmentHARVARD COLLEGE ASSOCIATION FORUS-CHINA RELATIONS — $1,000 · International
Other$18,153,758Education$581,350Religion$246,450Membership Benefit$22,500Arts & Culture$4,000Youth Development$1,200International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUMMIT RANCH INC — $2,924,488 over 4y, 50% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $196,050 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION — $195,600 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY EQUALITY — $183,400 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $152,900 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION — $43,500 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetNEW YORK THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $37,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $22,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECCLESIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK — $3,750 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN OUTLOOK FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER FOUNDATION AT PRINCETON NJ — $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Alliance For Media Arts Culture Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WESTMINSTER FOUNDATION PRINCETON NEW JERSEY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLANTON-PEALE INSTITUTE — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUMMIT RANCH INC
  • Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY EQUALITY
  • Who funds AUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds NEW YORK THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds ECCLESIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN OUTLOOK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER FOUNDATION AT PRINCETON NJ
  • Who funds The Alliance For Media Arts Culture Inc
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE WESTMINSTER FOUNDATION PRINCETON NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC
  • Who funds HARVARD COLLEGE ASSOCIATION FORUS-CHINA RELATIONS
  • Who funds BLANTON-PEALE INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA5.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mark D Hostetter and Alexander N Habib Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $449k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph