Skip to content
Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc

To provide financial support to local non-profit organizations with a focus on children.

$15k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Recreation & Sports$594kPhilanthropy$406kYouth Development$22kArts & Culture$16kScience & Tech$12kEducation$12k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELAWARE MAGIC$15,413
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SMYRNA-CLAYTON POP WARNER: $20k → 11%SMYRNA-CLAYTON POP WARNER: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$636k · 7 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$636k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
0%

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesScience & TechEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    Delmarva Aces Baseball and Softball Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $465k · revenue +128%
  • DM
    DELAWARE MAGIC GIRLS FAST PITCH INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $81k · revenue +289% · 31% of their budget
  • SC
    SMYRNA CLAYTON POP WARNER
    2× · 2017–2019 · $27k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SF
    SWOOP FASTPITCH
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • PW
    POP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • MS
    MID-ATLANTIC SHOCKERS BASEBALL CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Vipers Fastpitch

Delaware Vipers Fastpitch is a group of several highly competitive girl's fastpitch softball teams. Our players come from all over the Delmarva Peninsula. The coaches of our teams strive to promote commitment, teamwork, sportsmanship, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Delaware Sports Commission Inc

Mission is to bid recruit & host regional/national sporting events at all levels of competition for the purpose of utilizing sports facilities in the state. thereby enhancing the economic development of the state, generally improving…

Community Improvement
3
Delaware Youth Soccer Association

The teaching of soccer skills and to foster amateur sports competition by promoting, developing and governing youth soccer activities in the territory in which the activities of the corporation are principally to be conducted and by…

Youth Development
4
Delaware Express Athletic Organization

To promote girls youth softball

Recreation & Sports
5
Delmarva Titans Organization Inc

Provide services for the youth including softball and other related activities.

Youth Development
6
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
7
South Jersey Mystics Inc

The south jersey mystics organization is established for the specific purpose of developing a competitive youth fast-pitch softball program whose goals are to develop players capable of competing at the highest levels in the country with…

Philanthropy
8
Franklin Township Girls Softball

Youth Softball League

Recreation & Sports
9
Marauders Baseball Club

Youth Baseball league

—
10
Port City Girls Softball League

Softball league

Youth Development
11
Southern Maryland Athletic Alliance

Our mission is to enhance our local clubs and teams ability to provide high quality youth athletic programs to our community through strategic programs team partnership and long term planning.

Recreation & Sports
12
Dunlap Girls Softball Assoc

The dunlap girls softball association exists to devleop women of character through the wonderful sport of softball. experienced coaches will foster quality relationships to help athletes become good leaders, students, citizens, and…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delaware Magic Girls Fast Pitch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henlopen Soccer Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Delmarva Aces Baseball and Softball Inc: $465,338 · Recreation & SportsDelmarva Aces Baseball and Softball Inc+1 more: $15,031 · Recreation & SportsDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $405,745 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCDELAWARE MAGIC GIRLS FAST PITCH INC: $81,490 · Human ServicesDELAWARE MA…SMYRNA CLAYTON POP WARNER: $26,670 · Human ServicesSMYRNA CLAY…HARRINGTON POP WARNER: $24,016 · OtherSWOOP FASTPITCH: $6,660 · OtherPOP WARNER LITTLE SCHOLARS INC: $6,518 · OtherMID-ATLANTIC SHOCKERS BASEBALL CLUB: $5,115 · OtherFirst State Robotics Inc: $11,738 · Science & TechSUSSEX ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC: $11,528 · Education
Recreation & Sports$480,369Philanthropy$405,745Human Services$108,160Other$42,309Science & Tech$11,738Education$11,528

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDelmarva Aces Baseball and Softball Inc: $465,338 over 5y, 11% of budgetDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $405,745 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetDELAWARE MAGIC GIRLS FAST PITCH INC: $81,490 over 6y, 31% of budgetSMYRNA CLAYTON POP WARNER: $26,670 over 2y, 17% of budgetHENLOPEN SOCCER CLUB INC: $15,031 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFirst State Robotics Inc: $11,738 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetSUSSEX ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES INC: $11,528 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMID-ATLANTIC SHOCKERS BASEBALL CLUB: $5,115 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Fo…Amazonsmile Foundation
Delaware Community Foundation IncDE13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Horsey Family Youth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home