Loading…
· Public charity
Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc
To provide financial support to local non-profit organizations with a focus on children.
$15k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants
1
Communities
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Recreation & Sports$480kPhilanthropy$406kHuman Services$108kScience & Tech$12kEducation$12kOther$42k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
academicgamesmagicundercodeamateursports
2019
academicgamesmagicundercodeamateursports
2020
—
2021
—
2022
soccerpop warnerbaseballsoftballgamesmagicunder
2023
gamesmagicundercodeamateursportssoftball
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$15,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
- DELAWARE MAGIC$15,413
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 8 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
3
Total granted
$1.0M
$18k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+50%
-9%
Still filing today
88%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyScience & TechEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DADELMARVA ACES5× · 2017–2022 · $465k · revenue +118%
- DCDelaware Community Foundation6× · 2017–2022 · $406k · revenue +9%
- DMDELAWARE MAGIC6× · 2017–2023 · $81k · revenue +210%
Funded once
- SFSWOOP FASTPITCHone grant, 2022 · $7k
- DPDELMAR POP WARNERone grant, 2022 · $7k
- MSMID-ATLANTIC SHOCKERS BASEBALL CLUBone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Delaware Youth Soccer Association
The teaching of soccer skills and to foster amateur sports competition by promoting, developing and governing youth soccer activities in the territory in which the activities of the corporation are principally to be conducted and by…
Youth Development
2
Delaware Sports Commission Inc
The mission of the commission is to bid, recruit and host regional and national sporting events at all levels of competition in the state for the purpose of utilizing sports facilities in the state.
Community Improvement
3
Delaware Soccer Club Inc
Amateur youth soccer training and development.
Recreation & Sports
4
Delaware Ducks Youth Ice Hockey of
To teach boys and girls the sport of ice hockey and help develop the physical skills required in the competitvie environment of the sport.
Recreation & Sports
5
South River Shooters
South River Shooter's mission is to promote, encourage, direct and operate athletic programs for the youth of the South River area, Anne Arundel County, Maryland. The Organization strives to promote ideals of good citizenship as well as…
—
6
Delaware Express Athletic Organization
To promote girls youth softball
Recreation & Sports
7
South Jersey Mystics Inc
The south jersey mystics organization is established for the specific purpose of developing a competitive youth fast-pitch softball program whose goals are to develop players capable of competing at the highest levels in the country with…
Philanthropy
8
Southern Maryland Athletic Alliance
Our mission is to enhance our local clubs and teams ability to provide high quality youth athletic programs to our community through strategic programs team partnership and long term planning.
Recreation & Sports
9
Hockessin Soccer Club
To promote the sport of soccer, sportsmanship and physical fitness among the youth of delaware.
—
10
Delmarva Titans Organization Inc
Service our youth through the sport of fast pitch softball and related activities.
Youth Development
11
So Cal Aces Baseball Club
Youth sports
Religion
12
Orion Hunter FastPitch Club Inc
The primary purpose is to afford softball players in the Hampton Roads area with an organized, competitive, structured club enabling them to excel in competing in leagues and tournaments.
Recreation & Sports
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delaware Magic Girls Fast Pitch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henlopen Soccer Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Recreation & Sports$480,369Philanthropy$405,745Human Services$108,160Other$42,309Science & Tech$11,738Education$11,528
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Delaware Community Foundation IncDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DELAWARE MAGIC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 562430762 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on DELAWARE MAGIC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Horsey Family Youth Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines