· Private foundation
Horner Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
85% of Horner Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 39 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Horner Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 39 organizations, $112k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN RIVERS | $5,000 |
| LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION | $5,000 |
| HIGH-JUMP | $3,500 |
| OBAMA FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| HARVARD LAW SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| FAMILY FOCUS | $2,500 |
| CAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| MAGEN DAVID ADOM (RED CROSS OF ISRA | $2,500 |
| FAMILY FOCUS | $2,500 |
| FAMILY FOCUS | $2,500 |
| UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MU | $2,500 |
| HUNGER COALITION | $2,500 |
| OBAMA FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| ART INSTITUTE SUSTAINING FELLOWS | $2,500 |
| FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL | $2,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
69 repeat relationships: 59 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- HJHIGH JUMP4× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +34%
- LSLEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +22%
University of Chicago3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- RAREBECCA A COPELAND FUND FOR SOCIALone grant, 2022 · $5k
- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMANone grant, 2021 · $4k
- JUJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +33%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
How this is measured
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Family Focus ↗
- Who funds REBECCA A COPELAND FUND FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
- Who funds Elyssas Mission NFP ↗
- Who funds CAMP NEBAGAMON ↗
- Who funds MIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC ↗
- Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHATHAM INITIATIVE ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Marin Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Sacks Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Horner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Horner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Horner Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Horner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Horner’s filings →