Skip to content

· Private foundation

Horatio B Ebert Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.5MEducation$41kCommunity Improvement$26kInternational$17kEmployment$14kRecreation & Sports$9kHealth$5kArts & Culture$439Other$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $87k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRU$86,500
MISSION TO THE WORLD PCA INC$20,000
ORANGEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,500
Individual grant recipient$7,000
MIDDLE EAST MISSION$6,000
WORLD VENTURE$6,000
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC$5,000
NAVIGATORS$4,500
PIONEERS$4,000
TEAM EXPANSION$4,000
MISSION TO JAPAN$3,000
OCCOM MINISTRIES$3,000
RECLAIM$3,000
BIMI$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUMMER STREET CHURCH: $2k → 6%NAVIGATORS: $8k → 12%STANDING STONE: $3k → 11%LOS ALTOS GRACE BRETHERN CHURCH: $2k → 14%ORANGEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $523k → 13%MISSION TO JAPAN: $4k → 13%ALIVE AGAIN MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%CAMPUS OUTREACH: $3k → 16%TEAM EXPANSION: $5k → 17%IDEAS: $4k → 8%RESOURCING CHRISTIAN EDUCATION: $9k → 7%TEAM EXPANSION: $5k → 15%NAVIGATORS: $8k → 12%2020 Grants Paid: $235k → 13%MISSION TO JAPAN: $4k → 13%ALIVE AGAIN MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%TEAM EXPANSION: $5k → 17%IDEAS: $4k → 8%NAVIGATORS: $7k → 9%TEAM EXPANSION: $4k → 15%NAVIGATORS: $6k → 12%2019 GRANTS PAID: $234k → 13%MISSION TO JAPAN: $3k → 13%TEAM EXPANSION: $5k → 17%IDEAS: $4k → 8%NAVIGATORS: $5k → 9%2017 GRANTS PAID: $228k → 13%MISSION TO JAPAN: $3k → 13%IDEAS: $4k → 8%2017 GRANTS PAID: $213k → 13%MISSION TO JAPAN: $3k → 13%WORLD VENTURE: $6k → 8%ORANGEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $46k → 13%WORLD VENTURE: $6k → 8%ORANGEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $26k → 13%WORLD VENTURE: $6k → 8%ORANGEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $22k → 13%WORLD VENTURE: $4k → 8%ORANGEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $11k → 13%WORLD VENTURE: $4k → 8%PIONEERS: $4k → 13%PIONEERS: $4k → 13%PIONEERS: $4k → 13%PIONEERS: $4k → 13%PIONEERS: $4k → 13%JOBS PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 13%JOBS PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 13%JOBS PARTNERSHIP: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 23 repeat orgs$493k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$2.1M
$486k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+12%

Still filing today

22%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalArts & CultureEmploymentEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MIDDLE EAST MISSIONS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +16%
  • MT
    MISSION TO JAPAN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +32%
  • D
    DESTA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $14k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • 2G
    2020 Grants Paid
    one grant, 2020 · $235k
  • 2G
    2019 GRANTS PAID
    one grant, 2019 · $234k
  • RC
    Resourcing Christian Education International
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
2
Luis Palau Association

Proclaiming the Good News, Uniting the Church, and Impacting Cities Worldwide.

Religion
3
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
4
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
5
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
6
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
7
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
10
To Every Tribe

To every tribe exists to extend the worship of christ among all peoples by mobilizing the church, training disciple-makers, and sending missionary teams to plant churches among the unreached.

Religion
11
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
12
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amg International Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORANGEWOOD CHURCH: $626,150 · OtherORANGEWOOD CHURCHCRU: $613,700 · OtherCRU2017 GRANTS PAID: $441,251 · Other2017 GRANTS PAID2020 Grants Paid: $234,743 · Other2020 Grants Paid2019 GRANTS PAID: $234,115 · Other2019 GRANTS PAIDMISSION TO THE WORLD PCA INC: $109,000 · Other+23 more: $212,382 · Other+23 moreMIDDLE EAST MISSIONS INC: $22,000 · ReligionALIVE AGAIN MINISTRIES INC: $12,200 · ReligionResourcing Christian Education International: $9,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionMISSION TO JAPAN INC: $17,000 · InternationalAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · InternationalDESTA: $14,000 · EmploymentSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $205 · Arts & CultureORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $59 · Arts & CultureWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20 · EnvironmentNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $15 · Animals
Other$2,471,341Religion$44,200International$19,000Employment$14,000Arts & Culture$264Environment$20Animals$15

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDDLE EAST MISSIONS INC: $22,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetMISSION TO JAPAN INC: $17,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetDESTA: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALIVE AGAIN MINISTRIES INC: $12,200 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetResourcing Christian Education International: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL TRIPP MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $59 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION TO JAPAN INC ↗
  • Who funds DESTA ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE AGAIN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Resourcing Christian Education International ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds AMG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL TRIPP MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Horatio B Ebert Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Horatio B Ebert Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Orlando Science Centerinc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Horatio B Ebert Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph