Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hope Foundation co Philip M Francoeur Jr Trustee

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$799k
Granted FY2018
4
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$752k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$1.5MEmployment$785kHealth$38kReligion$12kHousing & Shelter$9kInternational$8kEducation$7kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
  • $250k+1 grant · $752k
$26,164
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fairfield Community Foundation$751,820
Fairfield Community Foundation$26,164
BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran$10,475
BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Mimu$10,475
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Mimu: $754k → 16%Planned Parenthood Marmonte: $7k → 8%American Humalayan Foundation: $2k → 10%Interim Inc: $5k → 12%Brain Behavior Research Foundtion: $17k → 6%Colgate University: $1k → 11%Planned Parenthood of Federation of: $3k → 17%The Salvation Army: $2k → 10%Connecticut College: $2k → 9%Fairfield Community Foundation: $752k → 9%Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation: $1k → 12%Homes with Hope: $5k → 19%NAMI: $6k → 7%BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran: $754k → 16%Food Bank for Monterey County: $5k → 12%Doctor Without Borders USA: $6k → 17%Planned Parenthood of Collier Count: $2k → 10%Fairfield Community Foundation: $26k → 9%BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Mimu: $10k → 16%St Matthews House: $4k → 10%Westport Public Library: $1k → 9%BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran: $10k → 16%Trinity Church: $12k → 10%Fairfield Community Foundation: $7k → 9%BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Mimu: $7k → 16%Blue Gavel Scholarship Fund: $1k → 10%A Better Chance of Westport: $1k → 9%BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran: $7k → 16%The Tumaini Fund USA: $925 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of Hope Foundation co Philip M Francoeur Jr Trustee’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hope Foundation co Philip M Francoeur Jr Trusteelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 3 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
21

Total granted

$2.3M
$86k

Still filing today

0%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Fairfield Community Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $785k
  • BC
    BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Mimu
    2× · 2017–2018 · $772k
  • BC
    BOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran
    2× · 2017–2018 · $772k

Funded once

  • BB
    Brain Behavior Research Foundtion
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • TC
    TRINITY CHURCH INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
4
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Mar Monte Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nami National. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fairfield Community Foundation: $785,203 · OtherFairfield Community FoundationBOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Mimu: $772,027 · OtherBOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - MimuBOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran: $771,997 · OtherBOA Charitable Gift Donor Ad - Fran+10 more: $55,750 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $7,000 · HealthNAMI National: $5,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 · HealthST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,000 · EducationBig Sur Land Trust: $3,000 · EnvironmentThe American Himalayan Foundation: $1,500 · InternationalTUMAINI FUND USA INC: $925 · InternationalA BETTER CHANCE OF WESTPORT INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,384,977Health$15,500Housing & Shelter$4,000Education$4,000Environment$3,000International$2,425Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME WITH HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERIM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE OF WESTPORT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTUMAINI FUND USA INC: $925 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope Foundation co Philip M Francoeur Jr Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope Foundation co Philip M Francoeur Jr Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope Foundation co Philip M Francoeur Jr Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph