Skip to content

· Private foundation

Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$902k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$287k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.4MEducation$1.2MFood & Nutrition$834kReligion$787kHealth$669kYouth Development$182kHousing & Shelter$155kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $407k
  • $250k+1 grant · $287k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER$286,859
DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER$118,092
LIGHT THE WAY MINISTRY$96,000
NORTHPOINT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC$73,000
LIGHT THE WAY MINISTRY$70,000
DESOTO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$50,000
SAV-A-LIFE OF DESOTO COUNTY$36,000
CONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY INC$20,000
AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC$18,000
MEMPHIS UNION MISSION$18,000
COMPEL CHURCH$15,000
HOPE HOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC$12,000
STREETS MINISTRIES INC$12,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MEMPHIS$12,000
SRVS GROUP HOME I INC$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER: $1.4M → 10%DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER: $287k → 10%DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER: $118k → 10%DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER INC: $87k → 10%DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER: $48k → 10%DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER: $10k → 10%STREETS MINISTRIES: $8k → 17%HOPE HOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC: $13k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $5k → 17%HOPE HOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC: $12k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $4k → 17%INTERFAITH COUNCIL ON POVERTY INC: $15k → 10%STREETS MINISTRIES: $12k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $11k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Homer Skelton Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 37 repeat orgs$827k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
22

Total granted

$5.5M
$756k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

41%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +352% · 67% of their budget
  • AC
    AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +197%
  • SO
    SAV-A-LIFE OF DESOTO COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • WM
    WESLEY MEADOWS CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $450k
  • CA
    CONCORD ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -5%
  • LF
    LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
2
Mississippi Christian Family Services Inc

To provide rehabilitative social services to the distressed, handicapped and underprivileged.

—
3
Christian Mission Centers Inc

The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.

—
4
Care Center Ministries Mississippi

Rescue the least the lost and the lonely...

Religion
5
Pregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee Inc

Our mission is to affirm the value of life by providing a network of care. We strive to empower mothers and fathers experiencing planned and unplanned pregnancies with healthy options through medical services, education, mentoring and…

Health
6
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
7
House of Grace

To offer a christ centered way out of a seemingly hopeless situation for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Life Choices of Memphis Inc

Exists to educate and empower women to choose and cherish life.

Health
9
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
10
My Choices Dba Obria Medical Clinics Pnw

To share the truth and love of Jesus Christ in conjunction with a ministry to those facing pregnancy related issues: a pregnant womens' counseling program, a free pregnancy testing program, a maternity support (baby supplies, clothing and…

Health
11
Life Ministries

Life ministries existes to shepherd people in a process of discoverying god's heart through teaching, writing, and spiritual direction in order to usher freedom through jesus christ.

—
12
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape Child and Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Borderless Brigade Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHPOINT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $782,944 · OtherNORTHPOINT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCHEARTLAND HANDS FOOD PANTRY: $754,000 · OtherHEARTLAND HANDS FOOD PANTRYWESLEY MEADOWS CAMPAIGN: $450,000 · OtherWESLEY MEADOWS CAMPAIGNDESOTO COUNTY SCHOOLS: $293,000 · OtherDESOTO COUNTY SCHOOLSCOMPEL CHURCH: $274,521 · OtherCOMPEL CHURCH+46 more: $1,132,942 · Other+46 moreDESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER INC: $1,984,111 · Human ServicesDESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER INCSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $73,900 · Human Services+2 more: $40,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT THE WAY MINISTRY: $316,000 · PhilanthropyMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $113,500 · Housing & ShelterOLIVE BRANCH COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $60,000 · Food & NutritionHEARTLAND HANDS INC: $11,500 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentCONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$3,687,407Human Services$2,098,011Philanthropy$316,000Housing & Shelter$113,500Food & Nutrition$71,500Youth Development$28,500Civil Rights$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER INC: $1,984,111 over 4y, 67% of budgetLIGHT THE WAY MINISTRY: $316,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetAGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $114,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $113,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCONCORD ACADEMY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetSAV-A-LIFE OF DESOTO COUNTY: $75,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $73,900 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetOLIVE BRANCH COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $60,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetHOPE HOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $18,600 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetINTERFAITH COUNCIL ON POVERTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHEARTLAND HANDS INC: $11,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $6,900 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMississippi College: $5,986 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBORDERLESS BRIGADE INC: $4,380 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHealing Hearts Child Advocacy Center: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTipton-Rosemark Academy Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESOTO COUNTY DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT THE WAY MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS UNION MISSON ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAV-A-LIFE OF DESOTO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds STREETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE BRANCH COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds CONFIDENTIAL CARE MOBILE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S HAVEN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COUNCIL ON POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HANDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN29.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · United Way of the Mid South · Community Foundation of Northwest Mississippi · The Knapp Foundation · Crews Family Foundation · Wiseheart Foundation Inc · Cadence Bank Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Homer Skelton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph