Skip to content

· Public charity

Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$681k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$12MCommunity Improvement$94k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$96,185
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Advocates for Mentally Ill Ho$680,998
County of Placer$550,560
Foothill House of Hospitality$203,736
Community Beyond Violence$185,160
Bright Futures for Youth$171,118
Placer County Whole Person Ca$125,000
Volunteers of America$122,342
Placer County Office of Educa$96,185
SPIRIT - Peers for Independen$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
Individual grant recipient$27,970
City of Roseville$19,000
Placer County Adult System of$15,409
Stand Up Placer$8,821
Nevada-Sierra Connecting Poin$6,334
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Gathering Inn: $573k → 6%Sierra Roots: $91k → 11%The Gathering Inn: $382k → 6%Advocates for Mentally Ill Ho: $2.2M → 6%Advocates for Mentally Ill Ho: $1.1M → 6%Advocates for Mentally Ill Ho: $681k → 6%Bright Futures for Youth: $171k → 11%FREED: $80k → 11%FREED Center for Independent: $68k → 11%Bright Futures for Youth: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 14 repeat orgs$991k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$11M
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-5%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $701k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FOOTHILL HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY DBA HOSPITALITY HOUSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +38%
  • TG
    THE GATHERING INN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $954k · revenue +303%
  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH
    2× · 2023–2025 · $201k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CP
    CONNECTING POINT
    one grant, 2023 · $94k
  • SR
    SIERRA ROOTS
    one grant, 2023 · $91k · revenue -26% · 71% of their budget
  • VV
    Victory Village Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $60k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
2
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
3
Advocates for the Mentally Ill Housing- Placer Inc

To House and Support the most vulnerable residents of the Sierra Region.

Health
4
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
5
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
6
People First of Santa Cruz County

To ensure housing for all by uniting the community, forming partnerships, inspiring advocacy and providing service

Housing & Shelter
7
Seasons Housing

Our slogan Its only a season, reflects the idea that recovery is not a lifelong struggle but a temporary process. Our goal is to provide the resources and support needed to help our residents navigate this season and come out stronger on…

Housing & Shelter
8
Welcome Home Housing Inc

Welcome Home Housing is a non-profit organization in Sacramento California that provides affordable housing and services to individuals with mental illness.

Human Services
9
Sacramento Cottage Housing Inc

Develop healing communities that are solution-focused, Participant-Driven and Strength-based, where homeless people help themselves - and each other - through their transition from the streets to self-sustainability.

Housing & Shelter
10
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
11
Mikes Place a non-profit recovery house
Health
12
Nevada County Habitat for Humanity

Building decent affordable homes in partnership with local families who qualify.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gathering Inn; the most unlike its peers is Spirit - Peers for Independence & Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Advocates for the Mentally Ill Housing Inc: $3,948,169 · Human ServicesAdvocates for the Mentally Ill Housing IncTHE GATHERING INN: $954,321 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING INNBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $201,118 · Human Services+2 more: $238,404 · Human ServicesPlacer County Adult System of: $773,447 · OtherPlacer County Adult System ofSTAND UP PLACER INC: $748,964 · OtherSTAND UP PLACER INCVolunteers of America: $556,730 · OtherVolunteers of AmericaCounty of Placer: $550,560 · OtherCounty of PlacerIndividual grant recipient: $362,344 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPlacer County Office of Educa: $346,181 · OtherPlacer County Office of EducaCommunity Beyond Violence: $215,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · Other+8 more: $352,318 · Other+8 moreFOOTHILL HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY DBA HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $2,767,957 · Housing & ShelterFOOTHILL HOUSE OF HOSPITA…Spirit - Peers for Independence & Recovery Inc: $158,679 · HealthVictory Village Inc: $60,000 · Public Benefit
Human Services$5,342,012Other$4,080,704Housing & Shelter$2,767,957Health$158,679Public Benefit$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAdvocates for the Mentally Ill Housing Inc: $3,948,169 over 3y, 17% of budgetFOOTHILL HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY DBA HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $2,767,957 over 3y, 25% of budgetTHE GATHERING INN: $954,321 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetSTAND UP PLACER INC: $748,964 over 2y, 18% of budgetCommunity Beyond Violence: $215,160 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $201,118 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSpirit - Peers for Independence & Recovery Inc: $158,679 over 3y, 13% of budgetFREED Center for Independent Living Inc: $147,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSIERRA ROOTS: $90,904 over 1y, 71% of budgetVictory Village Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Advocates for the Mentally Ill Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY DBA HOSPITALITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING INN ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP PLACER INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Beyond Violence ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Spirit - Peers for Independence & Recovery Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREED Center for Independent Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA ROOTS ↗
  • Who funds Victory Village Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dignity HealthAZ15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dignity Health · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras’ filings →

    More from the funding graph