Skip to content
Home Centered Care Institute at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Home Centered Care Institute

To improve the accessibility and quality of care available to medically complex patients and their caregivers, and to reduce overall health care costs by advancing the practice of home centered care.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.4MEducation$519k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$199,929
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$199,929
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA CENTER ON AGING: $140k → 15%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $32k → 22%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINAI: $85k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES: $28k → 17%MEDSTAR TOTAL ELDER CARE LLC: $91k → 14%THE CLEVELAND CLINIC - CENTER FOR CONNECTED CARE: $79k → 17%VNA HEALTH CARE: $498k → 8%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $372k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA CENTER ON AGING: $35k → 15%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINAI: $26k → 17%MEDSTAR TOTAL ELDER CARE LLC: $49k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $268k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $200k → 14%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIV OF IL: $70k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $352k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $94k → 14%RUSH: $94k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $68k → 14%JOURNEY CARE FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%JOURNEY CARE FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $210k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $170k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $155k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $65k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
AZ
AR
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 8 repeat orgs$526k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$3.3M
$526k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+76%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $280k · revenue +62%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    2× · 2018–2019 · $194k · revenue +39%
  • MH
    MEDSTAR HEALTH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $140k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • VH
    VNA Health Caregraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $498k · revenue +76%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
5
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
8
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
The Miriam Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
11
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
12
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vna Health Care; the most unlike its peers is American Academy of Home Care Medicine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,604,171 · ReligionThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foun…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $600,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDIC…THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $280,270 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONRush University Medical Center: $194,178 · HealthRush University Medical CenterMEDSTAR HEALTH INC: $139,756 · HealthMEDSTAR HEALTH INCVNA Health Care: $498,461 · OtherVNA Health CareUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $174,886 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $173,304 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA …+1 more: $27,777 · OtherICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $111,390 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $102,008 · Education
Religion$1,604,171Health$1,214,204Other$874,428Education$213,398

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $1,604,171 over 7y, 41% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $600,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetVNA Health Care: $498,461 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $280,270 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $194,178 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSTAR HEALTH INC: $139,756 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $111,390 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $102,008 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Home Centered Care Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Home Centered Care Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Medstar Health Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Home Centered Care Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home