Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Home Association of Lower Allen VFW Post 7530 Inc

The objects of this corporation are the maintenance of a club for social enjoyments and to provide facilities for lawful games, amusements, and social activities for and among its members.

$264k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182019.

Human Services$87kEducation$28kPublic Benefit$25kHealth$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kYouth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$6kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $120,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $264,378 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $143,478 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k7 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VFW POST 7530 RELIEF FUND$25,000
UNITED METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN$11,500
TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
PA WOUNDED WARRIORS$10,000
YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG AREA$10,000
CEDAR CLIFF HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
LEEK HUNTING AND MOUNTAIN PRESERVE$7,500
ALLEN MIDDLE SCHOOL$7,500
OPERATION VETERANS HOPE$6,000
BLESSINGS OF HOPE$6,000
VFW 18TH DISTRICT$6,000
LISBURN COMMUNITY FIRE CO$5,900
LOWER ALLEN VFW POST 7530 AUXILIARY$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG AREA: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Home Association of Lower Allen VFW Post 7530 Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 94% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Home Association of Lower Allen VFW Post 7530 Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$122k · 5 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$122k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Public BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k
  • PW
    PENNSYLVANIA WOUNDED WARRIORS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $21k · revenue +38%
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES AUX DEPT OF PA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $19k

Funded once

  • SF
    SHIREMANSTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • LA
    LOWER ALLEN FIRE CO #1
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawrence Park Volunteer Fire Department

Providing emergency, safety and fire services to lawrence park township pennsylvania.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Penryn Fire Company 1 Inc

Volunteer fire company

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Wilpen Fire Co of Ligonier Township

Provide fire protection and rescue services to the community

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Alum Bank Community Fire Company

Provided Fire & Rescue Services to Alum Bank, PA and surrounding area.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Fleetwood Fire Company

Protection of property and lives in Fleetwood, Pennsylvania

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Bushkill Fire Company

Provide fire protection services to residents of and businesses in lehman township and portions of middle smithfield township

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Levittown Fire Co 1

Provide fire relief

8
Landisburg Fire Company

Maintain fire and emergency equipment to provide continued protection for all persons in spring township, landisburg boro, and surrounding area

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Seelyville Fire Company

Provides volunteer fire protection and rescue services to the seelyville, pa and surrounding area.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Lancaster Township Fire Department

The mission of the lancaster township fire department is to serve the community by protecting lives,property and the environment in a safe, efficient and professional manner. the fire department is responsible for extinguishing fires, fire…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Shepherdstown Fire Department

Provides fire protection and ambulance service

12
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Methodist Home for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shiremanstown Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF PENNSYLVANIAVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES AUX DEPT OF PA — $18,910 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES AUX DEPT OF PAUNITED METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $18,000 · OtherUNITED METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN INCWEST SHORE SCHOOL DISTRICT — $17,500 · OtherWEST SHORE SCHOOL DISTRICTTRINITY HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherTRINITY HIGH SCHOOLPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $8,000 · OtherVFW 18TH DISTRICT — $6,000 · OtherLOWER ALLEN FIRE CO #1 — $6,000 · OtherLIGHT OF HOPE MINISTRIES — $6,000 · OtherOperation Veterans' Hope — $6,000 · OtherLISBURN COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY — $5,900 · OtherCAMP HILL BASEBALL COMMITTEE INC — $5,500 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA WOUNDED WARRIORS INC — $20,500 · Public BenefitPENNSYLVANIA WOUND…LEEK HUNTING AND MOUNTAIN PRESERVE INC — $15,000 · Public BenefitLEEK HUNTING AND M…YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $10,000 · Human ServicesSHIREMANSTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT — $9,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$157,810Public Benefit$35,500Human Services$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPENNSYLVANIA WOUNDED WARRIORS INC — $20,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHIREMANSTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT — $9,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetLOWER ALLEN FIRE CO #1 — $6,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetLISBURN COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY — $5,900 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCAMP HILL BASEBALL COMMITTEE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Home Association of Lower Allen VFW Post 7530 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Home Association of Lower Allen VFW Post 7530 Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Home Association of Lower Allen VFW Post 7530 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $36k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph