Skip to content
Holy Name Medical Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Holy Name Medical Center Inc

Holy name medical center, inc.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$22MEducation$1.4MHuman Services$176kInternational$58kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kYouth Development$50kReligion$18kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.1M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$554M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC$2,145,505
CAUCUS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION$125,000
METROPOLITAN YMCA OF THE ORANGES$50,000
TEANECK VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS$50,000
BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE$30,000
BERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
ADLER APHASIA CENTER$15,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAVE LATIN AMERICA: $13k → 14%SAVE LATIN AMERICA: $13k → 14%SHARSHERET INC: $85k → 7%SHARSHERET INC: $40k → 7%SHARSHERET INC: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 8 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$24M
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+72%

Still filing today

88%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $540k · revenue +22%
  • SI
    Sharsheret Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $275k · revenue +117%
  • SL
    SAVE LATIN AMERICA INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $176k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCHOLARSHIP FUND FOR INNER-CITY CHILDREN
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • CF
    CRUDEM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +136%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
2
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
3
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
4
Bon Secours Charity Health System Affiliated Group

The mission is to make visible god's love and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor, vulnerable and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and…

Health
5
St Joseph's Physician Health Pc

We, st. joseph's physician health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
6
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
7
Bronx County Medical Society

Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
12
Mjhs Medical Associates Pc

The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to practice the profession of medicine for affiliates of metropolitan jewish health system, inc., which provide medical and health services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caucus Educational Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $21,665,176 · HealthHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC+5 more: $376,550 · HealthSINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC: $540,000 · OtherBERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $89,207 · OtherMEDICAL SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $75,000 · OtherMetropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc: $50,000 · OtherTEANECK VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS: $50,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FUND FOR INNER-CITY CHILDREN: $30,000 · Other+3 more: $25,000 · OtherCAUCUS EDUCATIONAL CORP: $750,000 · EducationSAVE LATIN AMERICA INC: $176,000 · Human ServicesCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · International
Health$22,041,726Other$859,207Education$750,000Human Services$176,000International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $21,665,176 over 7y, 74% of budgetCAUCUS EDUCATIONAL CORP: $750,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetSINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC: $540,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $275,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSAVE LATIN AMERICA INC: $176,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $72,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMetropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADLER APHASIA CENTER: $15,550 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERGEN IRISH ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetPEACE CARE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hackensack Meridian H…Columbia Bank Foundat…The Russell Berrie Fo…The Provident Bank Fo…Pseg Foundation IncInvestors Foundation …Community Foundation …Jewish Communal FundThe Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-SubordinatesNJ17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Russell Berrie Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holy Name Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holy Name Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Save Latin America Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Adler Aphasia Center: 12% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Medical Society of New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Holy Name Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home