Skip to content
Holt Brothers Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Holt Brothers Foundation Inc

Family-centered care for kids who are impacted by a parent's cancer.

$34k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Health$170kHuman Services$58kEducation$30kArts & Culture$15kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $34,001 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,001 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP KESEM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $25k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $23k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 6 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$234k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+23%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $99k · revenue +63%
  • CK
    Camp Kesem National
    3× · 2019–2023 · $58k · revenue 0%
  • TR
    THE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $33k · revenue -13%

Funded once

  • DB
    Durham Bulls Baseball Club
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • BU
    BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
5
Rex Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

Health
6
Piedmont Health Foundation
Health
7
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Innovations in Healthcare Inc

Promote global access to cost-effective and high-quality healthcare. facilitate and encourage the broad and prompt dissemination of data and information relating to innovative healthcare solutions around the world.

Education
9
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
10
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
12
Caldwell Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide safe, effective, compassionate care and to promote healthy lifestyles to our community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barnes-Jewish St Peters & Progress West Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $99,368 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $17,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC+2 more: $5,000 · HealthTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · OtherTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION …CONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUN…Durham Bulls Baseball Club: $10,000 · OtherDurham Bulls Baseball ClubTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO: $10,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLI…APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY+1 more: $1,000 · OtherCamp Kesem National: $57,500 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem NationalCONTEMPORARY ART FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationBARNES-JEWISH ST PETERS & PROGRESS WEST FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Education
Health$121,868Other$76,000Human Services$57,500Arts & Culture$15,000Education$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $99,368 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $57,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ART FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARNES-JEWISH ST PETERS & PROGRESS WEST FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHelene Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Sisters Inspiring Sisters Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holt Brothers Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holt Brothers Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $21k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holt Brothers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home