Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Holt & Bugbee Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$120kYouth Development$35kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$15kCommunity Improvement$12kArts & Culture$10kScience & Tech$9kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$17,500
A WORKSHOP OF OUR OWN CO FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INC$12,000
NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL$10,000
PARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LA COLABORATIVE: $5k → 16%PROFESSIONAL CENTER FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN INC: $3k → 10%THE PROFESSIONAL CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 10%PARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 10%TEWKSBURY COMMUNITY PANTRY: $5k → 8%PARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$184k · 8 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$184k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+123%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    UTEC Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +1%
  • NB
    North Bennet Street School
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +20%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • TM
    TEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH CHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • BREAD & ROSES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry Inc

Loaves & fishes' mission is to provide nutritious food, in an atmosphere of kindness and respect, to individuals in need who reside in ayer, devens, dunstable, groton, harvard, littleton, and shirley, massachusetts.

Human Services
2
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
3
Our Neighbors' Table Inc

The Organization is committed to establishing a community that provides for the whole person with nourishing food, kindness and dignity. The Organization provides food directly to those experiencing food insecurity while also directing the…

Human Services
4
The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc

The mission of The Open Pantry is to relieve hunger in our community. We aim to connect people to a variety of filling, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food as well as to other community resources; to advocate on behalf of those in…

5
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

6
Massachusetts Avenue Project Inc

The mission of Massachusetts Avenue Project is to nurture the growth of a diverse and equitable community food system and promote local economic opportunities, access to affordable, nutritious food and social-change education.

Human Services
7
Bedford Community Table-Pantry Inc

To fight food insecurity and honor the dignity of all community members by supporting food assistance efforts in and around Bedford, MA.

Human Services
8
Feed Every Need

Feed Every Need is fighting hunger and food insecurity in Vermont by providing prepared meals to partner organizations for distribution to htose in need.

Food & Nutrition
9
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
10
Berk County Regional Employment Board

To provide policy guidance, selection and oversight and to organize programs for the purpose of work force development in berkshire county, massachusetts.

Employment
11
Berkshire Food Project Inc

To alleviate hunger, food insecurity and social isolation by serving healthy and dignified noontime meals every weekday by providing education in making good, nutritional choices and by helping people access available food resources.

Food & Nutrition
12
Root Ns Inc

Root's mission is to help young adults create a pathway to independence through food service training and employment. by developing essential life and work readiness skills, youth leave root prepared for success in the workplace.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Colaborativa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bread and Roses Heritage Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS CO TEWKSBURY M — $40,000 · OtherSTUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS CO TEWKSBURY MTEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL — $35,000 · OtherTEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC — $15,000 · OtherCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INCTEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH CHOOL — $15,000 · OtherTEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH CHOOLA WORKSHOP OF OUR OWN CO FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INC — $12,000 · OtherA WORKSHOP OF OUR OWN CO FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INCTEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL ROBOTICS CLUB — $9,000 · OtherTEWKSBURY MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL ROBOTICS CLUB+2 more — $7,000 · OtherUTEC Inc — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentUTEC IncNorth Bennet Street School — $30,000 · EducationNorth Bennet…PARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTEWKSBURY COMMUNITY PANTRY INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesLA COLABORATIVA INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBREAD AND ROSES HERITAGE COMMITTEE INC — $10,250 · Recreation & SportsBREAD & ROSES INC — $5,231 · Food & NutritionMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$163,000Youth Development$35,000Education$30,000Human Services$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,250Food & Nutrition$10,231

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUTEC Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Bennet Street School — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBREAD AND ROSES HERITAGE COMMITTEE INC — $10,250 over 2y, 13% of budgetPARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD & ROSES INC — $5,231 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEWKSBURY COMMUNITY PANTRY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTEC Inc
  • Who funds North Bennet Street School
  • Who funds CHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds BREAD AND ROSES HERITAGE COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds BREAD & ROSES INC
  • Who funds TEWKSBURY COMMUNITY PANTRY INC
  • Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · The Bulens Family Foundation · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Holt & Bugbee Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 34%
  • Utec Inc46% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc34% of income from government
  • Partners in Child Development Inc31% of income from government
  • Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph