· Private foundation
Holloway Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
- $250k+2 grants · $510k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRENTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH | $260,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| PUBLIC EDUCATION NEEDS COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT & LEADERSHIP | $150,000 |
| MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| CREATIVETS | $50,000 |
| CARSON BAPTIST CHURCH | $25,000 |
| NAHT COALITION INC | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL TRUST FUND | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| BAREFOOT REPUBLIC | $9,500 |
| PROJECT REDESIGN | $5,000 |
| SCOTT HAMILTON CARES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $480k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMississippi College5× · 2019–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +23%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $510k · revenue +11%
BUT GOD MINISTRIES4× · 2019–2023 · $262k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- NFNASHVILLE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $120k
- MAMADISON-RIDGELAND ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -7%
- BBBROADMOOR BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve
Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Mississippi Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mississippi College ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUT GOD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HOME OF GRACE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MADISON-RIDGELAND ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CREATIVETS ↗
- Who funds ROMANIAN-AMERICAN MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC ↗
- Who funds STANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTT HAMILTON CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOREIGN SERVICE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BURIED TREASURES HOME INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds PROJECT REDESIGN INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273) ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
- Who funds ANDREW JACKSON FOUNDATION FKA LADIES' HERMITAGE ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Servant Foundation · Andrea Waitt Carlton Family Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Feild Co-Operative Association · Louie M & Betty M Phillips Foundatn · Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender Trustee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Holloway Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Holloway Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Holloway Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.