Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hofheimer-Wright Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$438kArts & Culture$293kReligion$219kPhilanthropy$49kHealth$34kMembership Benefit$4kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $230k
$50,090
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VALENTINE MUSEUM$75,000
ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$55,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$50,090
ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL$50,000
ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL$25,000
YANKEE CHAPTER OF NAVDHA$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$947k · 14 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$947k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+45%

Still filing today

64%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VALENTINE MUSEUM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $275k · revenue +31%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    7× · 2017–2025 · $236k · revenue +5%
  • AJ
    ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $98k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SF
    SENTARA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • PP
    PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
4
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
5
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
University of Virginia Law School Foundation

The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.

Education
8
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
9
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
10
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Trinity College

To expand on the mission statement made on page 1, trinity's core mission values and characteristics emphasize: 1)commitment to the education of women in a particular way through the design and pedagogy of the historic undergraduate…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Richmond Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Daily Planet Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Trustees of Princeton University: $235,673 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL: $97,500 · EducationANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOLST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION+3 more: $11,500 · EducationST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $200,000 · OtherST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherST CATHERINE'S SCHOOLUNITED WAY: $44,000 · OtherUNITED WAYCLEVELAND CLINIC: $25,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICZION EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $18,000 · Other+15 more: $33,000 · Other+15 moreTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM: $275,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VALENTINE MUSEUMColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $2,000 · HealthPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesFEED MORE INC: $1,250 · Food & NutritionCARITAS: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$374,673Other$370,000Arts & Culture$292,000Philanthropy$2,500Health$2,000Human Services$1,250Food & Nutrition$1,250Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM: $275,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $235,673 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL: $97,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY PLANET INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds VA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds DAILY PLANET INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mary Morton Parsons FoundationVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Virginia Sargeant Reynolds Foundation · Universal Leaf Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Robins Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Good Shepherd Fund-Ima-Main · Massey Family Foundation · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · The Ruth Camp Campbell Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hofheimer-Wright Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hofheimer-Wright Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hofheimer-Wright Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hofheimer-Wright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hofheimer-Wright’s filings →

More from the funding graph