Skip to content

Virginia · Private foundation

Hofheimer-Wright Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$50,090
Largest grant, FY2025
$75,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 16
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$2.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Hofheimer-Wright Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$259k33%
FY20243$81k0%
FY20233$89k0%
FY20227$139k14%
FY202115$122k27%
FY202016$124k69%
FY20199$114k56%
FY20179$115kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$438kArts & Culture$293kReligion$219kPhilanthropy$49kHealth$34kMembership Benefit$4kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Hofheimer-Wright Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Valentine Museum$275,00072%
The Trustees of Princeton University$235,67370%
Anna Julia Cooper School$97,50051%
St Catherine's School Foundation$30,00040%
Zion Episcopal Church$18,0002n/a
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation$12,00020%
Virginia Wesleyan University$10,50020%
St Christopher's School Foundation$10,00020%
Historic Richmond Foundation$5,00020%
The Cross-Over Ministry Inc$2,00020%
Peter Paul Development Center Inc$1,25010%
Feed More Inc$1,25010%
Va Foundation for Independent Colleges$1,00010%
Caritas$50010%
Daily Planet Incorporated$50010%

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($341k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Hofheimer-Wright Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Valentine Museum: $275,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $235,673 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAnna Julia Cooper School: $97,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSt Catherine's School Foundation: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVirginia Wesleyan University: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Christopher's School Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Richmond Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Cross-Over Ministry Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPeter Paul Development Center Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeed More Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVa Foundation for Independent Colleges: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDaily Planet Incorporated: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mary Morton Parsons FoundationVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Virginia Sargeant Reynolds Foundation · Universal Leaf Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Robins Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Good Shepherd Fund-Ima-Main · Massey Family Foundation · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · The Ruth Camp Campbell Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hofheimer-Wright Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hofheimer-Wright Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hofheimer-Wright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Hofheimer-Wright Foundation

How much does Hofheimer-Wright Foundation give?
Hofheimer-Wright Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $259,090 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Hofheimer-Wright Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (42%), Arts & Culture (28%), Religion (21%).
Who are Hofheimer-Wright Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Valentine Museum ($275k), The Trustees of Princeton University ($236k), Anna Julia Cooper School ($98k).
Does Hofheimer-Wright Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Hofheimer-Wright Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hofheimer-Wright Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation, The Community Foundation Inc, Virginia Sargeant Reynolds Foundation.
Where is Hofheimer-Wright Foundation based?
Hofheimer-Wright Foundation is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hofheimer-Wright’s filings →

More from the funding graph