· Private foundation
Hm Sarij Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $132k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENNY APPEAL USA | $81,700 |
| ISLAMIC CENTER OF MELVILLE | $50,765 |
| VARIOUS OTHER SUPPORT | $43,800 |
| MUSLIMI FOUNDATION | $20,500 |
| HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT INC | $19,200 |
| COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS | $17,000 |
| ISLAMIC RELIEF USA | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,500 |
| ISLAMIC CENTER OF DEER PARK | $12,000 |
| MASJID BILAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,500 |
| MASJID SUNNAH | $8,000 |
| AMOUD FOUNDATION | $5,720 |
| ISLAMIC CIRCLE OF NORTH AMERICA | $5,223 |
| RAHMA WORLDWIDE | $5,129 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC6× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +46%
- IRISLAMIC RELIEF USA3× · 2019–2024 · $112k · revenue +66%
- MAMDQ ACADEMY4× · 2018–2024 · $26k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- SESARAY EDUCATION CENTERone grant, 2021 · $70k
- EGEBAY GIVING WORKS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $50k
- ZCZaytuna College Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…
Human Rights Project
To spread islamic values to the globe through media
Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.
Innovative religious approach to promote shared values
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand for Relief and Development Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hamza Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PENNY APPEAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ALLAHU AKBAR ↗
- Who funds MASJID AL-RASHEED INC ↗
- Who funds MDQ ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSLIMS OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds American Slovenian Education Found ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC CIRCLE OF NORTH AMERIC DBA RISING STARS ISLAMIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AUTOMATIC MERCHANDISING ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Abdul Satar & Family Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · The Hamd Foundation Inc · M B Ahmed Family Foundation · Tabani Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Mumtaz Foundation · Noor Munshi Foundation · The Syed Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hm Sarij Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.