Skip to content
Hlvf Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hlvf Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Animals$70kHealth$65kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$15kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$496k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVELAND INTER FAITH EFFORT INC LIFE FOOD PANTRY$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD CINCINNATI REGION$15,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT INC$15,000
CINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
MY DOGS EAT FIRST$10,000
GIVE LIKE A MOTHER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LOVELAND INTER FAITH EFFORT INC LIFE FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 9%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%GIVE LIKE A MOTHER: $5k → 9%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$135k · 4 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$135k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+20%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +35%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +2%
  • MD
    My Dog Eats First Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +24% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • LS
    LOVELAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SF
    SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour

Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
2
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
3
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
4
Shelter Available for Family Emergency (Safe) Inc

The mission of shelter available for family emergency (safe), inc. of transylvania county is to provide shelter, counseling, court advocacy, and independent living assistance for victims of domestic violence and their families.

Human Services
5
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
6
Cincinnati Action for Housing Now

Ballot issue political action committee advocating for levy to support the homelessness population in Ohio.

—
7
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
8
Grace Family Luv

Help communities heal by providing transitional housing for female abuse victims

Human Services
9
Birthline of Loveland

At Birthline Pregnancy Resource Center, our mission is to empower women and their families to navigate unplanned pregnancies with confidence and hope. We provide a safe and supportive environment where individuals can explore their…

—
10
Laundry Love Cincinnati

Providing community based services to families that are in need.

—
11
Crisis Care Line

Domestic violence victim services

—
12
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is Loveland Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETY: $45,000 · AnimalsCINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETYMy Dog Eats First Inc: $25,000 · AnimalsMy Dog Eats First IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD CINCINNATI REGION: $35,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD CINC…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INCLOVELAND INTER FAITH EFFORT INC LIFE FOOD PANTRY: $15,000 · Human ServicesLOVELAND INTER FAITH…SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CH…THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN…GIVE LIKE A MOTHER: $5,000 · Human ServicesGIVE LIKE A MOTHERLOVELAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Animals$70,000Other$35,000Civil Rights$30,000Human Services$30,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCINCINNATI ANIMAL CARE HUMANE SOCIETY: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMy Dog Eats First Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetLOVELAND INTER FAITH EFFORT INC LIFE FOOD PANTRY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hlvf Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hlvf Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hlvf Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home