Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hjd Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.4MEducation$701kHuman Services$623kPublic Benefit$372kArts & Culture$249kCrime & Legal$207kEnvironment$162kReligion$67kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $692k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $650k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE$90,000
THE NEWMAN SCHOOL$80,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC OPERATING ACT$80,000
UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INC$70,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASS MED SCHOOL$60,000
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$60,000
UMF FD1 UNALLOCATED$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
HOOVER FOUNDATION$50,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$50,000
TEAM IMPACT INC$46,000
SHATTERPROOF$45,000
AMERICAN INSTITUE FOR BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY$45,000
YANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY$42,500
AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $332k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $22k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $20k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $20k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $90k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $80k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 33 repeat orgs$659k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -58% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
8

Total granted

$3.3M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-58%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $505k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $310k · revenue +6%
  • TN
    THE NEWMAN SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $215k · revenue +41%
  • TI
    TEAM IMPACT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $213k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • H
    HCZ
    one grant, 2021 · $37k
  • TT
    THE TOWN OF NEWPORT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hoover Foundation Income Account. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $310,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSIONYANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $237,000 · OtherYANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICYUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INC: $190,000 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INCFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $164,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCUMF FD1 UNALLOCATED: $115,000 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INC OPERATING ACCOUNT: $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCHOOL: $100,000 · Other+33 more: $1,181,698 · Other+33 moreTHE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $215,000 · EducationTHE NEWMAN SC…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COL…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $87,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…KHAN ACADEMY INC: $42,000 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY …NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationNORWALK COMMU…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $265,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CH…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $67,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED W…SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $190,000 · HealthThe New London Hospital Association Inc: $54,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthTEAM IMPACT INC: $213,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFUTURE 5 INC: $162,000 · Youth DevelopmentAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST: $95,000 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $67,000 · Environment
Other$2,407,698Education$479,000Human Services$332,000Health$299,000Philanthropy$233,000Youth Development$162,000Environment$162,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $310,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $265,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $237,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTHE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $215,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $213,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $190,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $164,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC: $162,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST: $95,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $87,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $67,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $67,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New London Hospital Association Inc: $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOOVER FOUNDATION INCOME ACCOUNT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS: $50,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $42,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTATEN ISLAND MENTAL HEALTH SOCIETY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds YANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE 5 INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds The New London Hospital Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOOVER FOUNDATION INCOME ACCOUNT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds JOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Natalie W & Leo E Wolf Foundation · The Burkehaven Family Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hjd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hjd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hjd’s filings →

More from the funding graph