Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$6,720
Largest grant, FY2025
$33,600
Organizations funded a year
13 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.9M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$117k0%
FY202413$135k8%
FY202313$131k8%
FY202213$184k0%
FY202113$126k0%
FY202013$120k0%
FY201913$120k8%
FY201813$100kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$322kHealth$277kHuman Services$252kEducation$61kYouth Development$61kCommunity Improvement$61k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($471k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBraille Institute of America Inc: $70,630 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMasonic Homes of California: $70,630 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Special Children's League Inc: $65,040 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetPepperdine University: $60,540 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCedars-Sinai Medical Center: $60,540 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSt Anne's Foundation: $60,540 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc: $60,540 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetLos Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging: $54,540 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Star Homes of California: $20,180 over 8y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw with peer funders

About Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw

How much does Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw give?
Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw reported 13 grants totaling $116,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (31%), Health (27%), Human Services (24%).
Who are Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Braille Institute of America Inc ($71k), Masonic Homes of California ($71k), The Special Children's League Inc ($65k).
Does Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw based?
Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hirsch Fred and Lucille Fdn Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph