· Private foundation
Hirsch Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k13 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $171k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $161k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $85,000 |
| KHAL BOBUV 45 | $76,000 |
| TOV V'CHESED | $27,800 |
| CONG TORAS CHAIM OF FLATBUSH | $25,500 |
| YESHIVAS ORCHOS CHAIM | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| CONG MACHNE SHALVA | $18,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF IDF | $18,000 |
| CONG SHAAREI ZION OF BOBOV | $18,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,304 |
| KIMPTORIN AID | $10,000 |
| BNOS ESTHER MALKA | $9,000 |
| MARAH YECHEZKEL OF FLATBUSH | $7,200 |
| LAGBAOMER OF NEW JERSEY INC | $7,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Moshe Ben Shlomo Charitable Foundation · The Ackerman Family Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Hirsch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hirsch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
- Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hirsch Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hirsch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Hirsch Family’s filings →