Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hill Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$60kReligion$41kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$19kAnimals$13kHealth$11kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLDEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$18,500
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WORCESTER$10,000
PRINCE OF PEACE PARISH$10,000
FIRST CONG CHURCH OF HOLDEN$8,000
TEMPO$5,000
MCAULEY NAZARETH$3,000
GREATER WORCESTER OPERA$3,000
WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$2,000
ANIMAL SHELTER OF STERLING$1,500
WORCESTER CHILDREN'S CHORUS$1,000
VISITATION HOUSE$1,000
FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WITH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MCAULEY NAZARETH INC: $4k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH: $3k → 11%VISITATION HOUSE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 7 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$121k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+9%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +2%
  • MN
    MCAULEY NAZARETH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +3%
  • AS
    ANIMAL SHELTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CC
    CROSSROADS CONTINUUM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +53%
  • WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Wellesley College

To provide an excellent liberal arts education for women who will make a difference in the world.

Education
4
Worcester Academy

Worcester academy exists to instill in its students the desire to learn throughout life, to engage passionately with the world around them, and to be honorable persons of strong and resourceful character.

Education
5
The Waldorf School Inc

The waldorf school of lexington nurtures each child's curiosity, ingenuity, and love of learning so that they can meet the future with wonder, confidence, and resilience.

Education
6
Worcester Art Museum

To connect people, communities, and cultures through experience of art. collect the most significant works of art available in an effort to shape the quality/scope of the permanent collection while adhering to the institution's…

Arts & Culture
7
Master Singers of Worcester Inc

Performing high quality choral music for the enjoyment and education of both the performers and listeners.

—
8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
10
Wicn Public Radio Inc

To operate as a noncommercial educational fm broadcast public radio station for purposes of providing a cultural, educational, literary, scientific, artistic and musical outlet for the area community.

—
11
Worcester County Humane Society Inc

To promote humane treatment of animals, operate the animal shelter, and assist with the adoption of animals.

Animals
12
A Worcester Schubertiad Inc

To provide concerts of classical music for the general public as well as educational concerts for students of all grades in the greater worcester area elementary schools, high schools and colleges. to provide for the encouragement of music…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Worcester Polytechnic Institute; the most unlike its peers is Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLDEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $49,500 · OtherHOLDEN CHRISTIAN ACADEMYPRINCE OF PEACE PARISH: $26,500 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE PARISHTEMPO INC: $21,000 · OtherTEMPO INCROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $10,000 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WORCESTERFIRST CONG CHURCH OF HOLDEN: $8,000 · OtherFIRST CONG CHURCH OF HOLDENFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF HOLDEN: $6,000 · OtherWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $4,500 · OtherCROSSROADS CONTINUUM INC: $10,000 · EducationCROSSROADS…WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationWESLEYAN U…WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $7,000 · AnimalsANIMAL SHELTER INC: $4,000 · AnimalsMCAULEY NAZARETH INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesVISITATION HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGreater Worcester OperaInc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAR FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS: $1,000 · Health
Other$130,500Education$15,000Animals$11,000Human Services$8,000Arts & Culture$3,000Philanthropy$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEMPO INC: $21,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCROSSROADS CONTINUUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMCAULEY NAZARETH INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Worcester OperaInc: $3,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE SAR FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hill Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hill Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Mcauley Nazareth Inc: 74% of income from government
  • Federation for Children Wspecial Needs: 10% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 8% of income from government
  • Crossroads Continuum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Animal Shelter Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hill Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hill Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hill Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph