Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Highland Area Community Foundation

Develop and promote highland community projects and activities

$393k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$245kEducation$147kInternational$146kReligion$114kHuman Services$41kMembership Benefit$26kAnimals$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $108,555 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $393,301 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $284,746 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
$15,070
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CDH INTERNATIONAL$45,000
Individual grant recipient$28,526
ST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,070
HIGHLAND PIERRON FIRE DEPT$14,176
HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL$5,783
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $6k → 16%HIGHLAND HOME: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 10 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$1.3M
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+12%

Still filing today

30%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    9× · 2017–2025 · $623k
  • RP
    RELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $239k · revenue -26% · 46% of their budget
  • CI
    CDH INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $137k · revenue -20%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
  • ME
    METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -16%
  • OF
    OPERATION FINALLY HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heartland Humane Society of Missouri

Heartland Humane Society of Missouri is a 501 c3 non profit group of dedicated foster homes that gives abandoned abused and unwanted animals another chance for loving permanent homes through our adoption program following the no-kill…

Animals
2
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
3
Habitat for Humanity International Emporia Area

To build and provide adequate housing to qualified familes.

4
High Desert Humane Society

The mission of the High Desert Humane Society is to promote and to provide humane and ethical treatment of companion animals through facility care, adoption, community education and programs which address pet over population.

Animals
5
Hometown Habitat for Humanity Inc

Construct homes for needy families

6
Wright County Childrens Home

Provide care, housing and training to displaced and disadvantaged children

Human Services
7
Laurens County Humane Society

Assist in pet adoption ownership & care

Community Improvement
8
Orange Co in Habitat for Humanity Inc

Hfh is a christian non-profit organization working towards the elimination of poverty by making decent shelter available. orange county, indiana hfh provides residential housing for low income families who have been residents of orange…

9
Humane Society of the Ouachitas

Humane treatment of animals

Animals
10
Tender Life Maternity Home

Tender Life is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help and hope for women during their pregnancies and beyond.

Housing & Shelter
11
Heartland Housed

To transform the landscape of homelessness in springfield and sangamon county, il.

Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity International

Build homes for god's people in need.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Social Services of Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Knights of Columbus 1580. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $622,903 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $85,283 · OtherST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOLST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH — $64,924 · OtherST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCHKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 1580 — $39,205 · OtherHIGHLAND CUSD 5 — $37,106 · Other+15 more — $163,406 · Other+15 moreRELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTER — $239,063 · HealthRELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CE…CDH INTERNATIONAL — $137,000 · HealthCDH INTERNATIONALHIGHLAND AREA CHRISTIAN SERVICE MINISTRY — $23,698 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION FINALLY HOME — $14,000 · Housing & ShelterMETRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,280 · AnimalsHIGHLAND HOME — $11,069 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $6,000 · Human Services
Other$1,012,827Health$376,063Housing & Shelter$37,698Animals$25,280Human Services$17,069

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTER — $239,063 over 3y, 46% of budgetCDH INTERNATIONAL — $137,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 1580 — $39,205 over 4y, 14% of budgetMETRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,280 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHIGHLAND AREA CHRISTIAN SERVICE MINISTRY — $23,698 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME — $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTER
  • Who funds CDH INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 1580
  • Who funds METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HIGHLAND AREA CHRISTIAN SERVICE MINISTRY
  • Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME
  • Who funds HIGHLAND HOME
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Highland Area Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Highland Area Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Highland Area Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph