Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hidden Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$169kHousing & Shelter$154kHuman Services$152kFood & Nutrition$143kEducation$127kYouth Development$101kArts & Culture$66kReligion$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $180k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FISH OF VANCOUVER$15,000
FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$15,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF VANCOUVER$15,000
COUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS$15,000
SHARE HOUSE$15,000
VANCOUVER FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
ARTHUR D CURTIS CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER$15,000
OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST WA$15,000
CLARK COUNTY HISTORICIAL MUSEUM$15,000
YWCA SAFECHOICE SHELTER$15,000
SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL$15,000
CLARK COLLEGE$4,118
VANCOUVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$4,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $15k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 30 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+19%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +113%
  • CC
    CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $58k · revenue +143%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue +19%
  • FW
    FISH WESTSIDE FOOD PANTRY OF VANCOU
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelan Valley Hope

Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…

Human Services
2
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
3
F I S H of Orchards Inc

FISH of Orchards, Inc. is an emergency food and clothing bank located in east Clark County, WA.

Food & Nutrition
4
Serenity House of Clallam County

Reduce homelessness in clallam county by providing resources for people to prevent evictions, receive funds for rental assistance, and shelters for families and adults.

Housing & Shelter
5
Skagit Valley Hospitality House Association

To reflect the heart of God by feeding, sheltering, clothing, healing and empowering those in need. Programs include housing, a cafe and job training system, shelter resources, and more. Our core values are: compassion, respect, joy and…

Housing & Shelter
6
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
7
Volunteer Hospice of Clallam County

Volunteer Hospice of Clallam County's (VHOCC) mission is to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support to terminally ill patients and their families with free around the clock registered nursing availability and trained volunteers.…

Health
8
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
9
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
10
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
11
St Francis House

St. Francis House provides food clothing and necessities at no cost to people with low income or experiencing homelessness in King County Washington. Single men women and families are welcome.

—
12
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council for the Homeless; the most unlike its peers is Shared Hope International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA SAFECHOICE SHELTER: $72,000 · OtherYWCA SAFECHOICE SHELTERVANCOUVER FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherVANCOUVER FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $58,000 · OtherWA STATE UNIVERSITYCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $51,000 · OtherCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANKCHILDREN'S CENTER OF VANCOUVER: $47,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER OF VANCOUVERSALVATION ARMY: $45,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYDAYBREAK: $41,600 · OtherDAYBREAKBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SO: $39,600 · OtherFREE CLINIC OF SW WA: $38,000 · OtherVANCOUVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $36,372 · OtherCLARK COUNTY HISTORICIAL MUSEUM: $35,000 · OtherARTHUR D CURTIS CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $35,000 · OtherOPTION 360 PREGNANCY CLINIC: $27,000 · OtherHOUGH FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherSALMON CREEK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $27,000 · Other+11 more: $134,252 · Other+11 moreOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES: $73,000 · Housing & ShelterOPEN HOUSE M…COUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS: $47,000 · Housing & ShelterCOUNCIL FOR …CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION: $58,000 · EducationSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 · Human ServicesFISH OF VANCOUVER: $20,000 · Human ServicesFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $35,000 · HealthMARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART: $14,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$778,824Housing & Shelter$120,000Education$58,000Human Services$55,000Health$35,000Arts & Culture$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES: $73,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION: $58,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $51,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS: $47,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOUGH FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetMARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART: $14,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HOUGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF VANCOUVER ↗
  • Who funds SHARE ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Firstenburg FoundationWA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Honorable Frank L & Arlene G Price Foundation · The Tod and Maxine McClaskey Family Foundation · Beaches Summertime Cruisin' · Columbia Community Credit Union · Anna C Macaskill Schwab and Dwight L Schwab · Clark County Food Bank · Kmr Group Foundation · The Swigert Foundation · PeaceHealth · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hidden Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hidden Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hidden Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Hidden Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hidden’s filings →

    More from the funding graph