Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hickey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$235kEducation$105kEnvironment$51kPhilanthropy$40kArts & Culture$37kHuman Services$30kAnimals$30kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $64k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$883k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA$22,000
SERVANTS OF MARY DEVELOPMENT$12,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
COLLEGE OF ST MARY$10,000
ST AUGUSTINE INDIAN MISSION$10,000
LIGHTSHINE CANINE$5,000
JPII NEWMAN CENTER$5,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,000
CIRCLE THEATRE$5,000
NOTRE DAME SISTERS - PROUD LEGACY$4,000
RONCALLI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ST BERNARD CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $2k → 5%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $3k → 8%CANYON CREEK WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 13%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$504k · 31 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$504k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

39%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureReligionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +14%
  • CF
    CUES FUND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +57%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF IOWA
    one grant, 2021 · $48k
  • BS
    BRIDIT SAINT BRIGIT THEATRE
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • BS
    BRIGIT ST BRIGIT THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great River Rescue

Operation of an animal shelter for unwanted and abandoned animals, community education to encourage humane treatment and responsible ownership.

Animals
2
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
3
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
4
Midlands Humane Society

To protect and nurture companion animals and enrich the lives of people who love them.

Animals
5
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
8
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
9
Vna Hospice of Southwest Iowa

Cherishing life's journey through an extraordinary commitment to compassion, comfort and holistic care.

—
10
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
11
The Visiting Nurse Health Services

Delivering community-based care that provides peace of mind, quality of life and independence.

Health
12
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Visiting Nurse Association of the Midlands; the most unlike its peers is Bellevue University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA: $110,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHATHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF IOWA: $48,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF IOWACATHOLIC CHARITIES IRISH FEST: $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES IRISH FESTST AUGUSTINE INDIAN MISSION: $40,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE INDIAN MISSIONSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYSERVANTS OF MARY DEVELOPMENT: $30,000 · OtherSERVANTS OF MARY DEVELOPMENTST BERNARD CATHOLIC CHURCH: $17,500 · Other+26 more: $168,250 · Other+26 moreCUES FUND: $18,000 · ReligionTHE BIG GARDEN: $11,250 · ReligionCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $25,000 · EducationMIDWEST DOG RESCUE NETWORK INC: $8,000 · AnimalsLightshine Canine Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsRSQ: $3,000 · AnimalsNEBRASKA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2,000 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterBRIGIT ST BRIGIT THEATRE COMPANY: $6,900 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureAdopt-A-Native Elder: $6,500 · Human ServicesCANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$493,750Religion$29,250Education$25,000Animals$18,000Housing & Shelter$16,000Arts & Culture$13,900Human Services$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCUES FUND: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE THEATRE INC: $15,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BIG GARDEN: $11,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST DOG RESCUE NETWORK INC: $8,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetBRIGIT ST BRIGIT THEATRE COMPANY: $6,900 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRSQ: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA PERMACULTURE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTHE VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF THE MIDLANDS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds CUES FUND ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds KINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST DOG RESCUE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGIT ST BRIGIT THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Lightshine Canine Inc ↗
  • Who funds RSQ ↗
  • Who funds CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PERMACULTURE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Claire M Hubbard Foundation · Amy L Scott Family Foundation · Cl Werner Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hickey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hickey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hickey Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hickey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hickey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph