Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heuermann Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$107k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Heuermann Family Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Hamilton Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’19
4
’20
0
’21
1
’22
2
’23
2
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$595kPhilanthropy$224kReligion$35kFood & Nutrition$12kHuman Services$8kAnimals$5kMembership Benefit$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$106,677
PHILLIPS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
PHILLIPS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$5,000
HAMILTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$5,000
HENDERSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HENDERSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hastings Masonic Temple Association

To preserve and maintain the masonic temple in hastings, ne.

—
2
The Nebraska Cooperative Council Education Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to encourage high school graduates to pursue higher education in the agricultural and agribusiness fields through scholarships and the implementation of school-to-work programs with participating nebraska…

Education
3
Hay Springs School Community Foundation

Operates for the promotion and support of the city of hay springs, nebraska, the hay springs public school district, and the surrounding community.

Human Services
4
Nebraska Masonic Foundation

The foundation serves as a cultural, educational, historical, and literary organization for the maintenance and support of masonry.

Membership Benefit
5
Harvard Community Foundation Inc

The harvard community foundation is dedicated to the future by encouraging donations for social, cultural, and educational progress in harvard, nebraska.

Philanthropy
6
Community Christian School of Weste Rn Nebraska Inc

Encourage students to learn and apply god's truth while promoting academic excellence in a christian environment.

Education
7
Nebraska Medical Foundation

To support activities, including the awarding of scholarships to medical students, promote the wellness and health of citizens in nebraska, provide education on medical subjects, and other research projects consistent with its activities.

Health
8
Nebraska Health Care Foundation

To ensure that there will be an adequate number of highly trained nurses and dietary staff to care for the residents of the state's nursing homes and assisted living facilities.

—
9
First Presbyterian Church Foundation

To support the first presbyterian church of hastings, nebraska.

Religion
10
Nebraska Hospitality Association

To promote the restaurant industry

—
11
Nebraska Hospital Association Research and Educational Foundation

To provide educational opportunities that enable nha members to be up-to- date and responsive to health care challenges and reforms. the foundation is committed to providing the highest-quality, cost-effective and readily accessible health…

—
12
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hamilton Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henderson Child Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $350,000 · EducationNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $140,000 · EducationNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION+1 more: $5,000 · EducationHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $174,075 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOU…PHILLIPS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherPHILLIPS COM…UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - PHILLIPS: $28,000 · OtherUNITED METHO…UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherUNITED METHO…THE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME: $5,000 · OtherPHILLIPS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherAURORA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · OtherHAMILTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionHENDERSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Education$595,000Philanthropy$174,075Other$100,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $174,075 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $140,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIPS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetHASTINGS SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann FoundationNE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann Foundation · Hamilton Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heuermann Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heuermann Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heuermann Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Heuermann Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heuermann Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph