Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Heuermann Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$107k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Heuermann Family Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Hamilton Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
19
4
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
2
24
4
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$595kPhilanthropy$224kReligion$35kFood & Nutrition$12kHuman Services$8kAnimals$5kMembership Benefit$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$106,677
PHILLIPS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
HAMILTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$5,000
PHILLIPS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$5,000
HENDERSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HENDERSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hastings Masonic Temple Association

To preserve and maintain the masonic temple in hastings, ne.

2
The Nebraska Cooperative Council Education Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to encourage high school graduates to pursue higher education in the agricultural and agribusiness fields through scholarships and the implementation of school-to-work programs with participating nebraska…

Education
3
Hay Springs School Community Foundation

Operates for the promotion and support of the city of hay springs, nebraska, the hay springs public school district, and the surrounding community.

Human Services
4
Nebraska Masonic Foundation

The foundation serves as a cultural, educational, historical, and literary organization for the maintenance and support of masonry.

Membership Benefit
5
Harvard Community Foundation Inc

The harvard community foundation is dedicated to the future by encouraging donations for social, cultural, and educational progress in harvard, nebraska.

Philanthropy
6
Community Christian School of Weste Rn Nebraska Inc

Encourage students to learn and apply god's truth while promoting academic excellence in a christian environment.

Education
7
Nebraska Medical Foundation

To support activities, including the awarding of scholarships to medical students, promote the wellness and health of citizens in nebraska, provide education on medical subjects, and other research projects consistent with its activities.

Health
8
Nebraska Health Care Foundation

To ensure that there will be an adequate number of highly trained nurses and dietary staff to care for the residents of the state's nursing homes and assisted living facilities.

9
First Presbyterian Church Foundation

To support the first presbyterian church of hastings, nebraska.

Religion
10
Nebraska Hospitality Association

To promote the restaurant industry

11
Nebraska Hospital Association Research and Educational Foundation

To provide educational opportunities that enable nha members to be up-to- date and responsive to health care challenges and reforms. the foundation is committed to providing the highest-quality, cost-effective and readily accessible health…

12
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hamilton Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henderson Child Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $350,000 · EducationNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $140,000 · EducationNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION+1 more — $5,000 · EducationHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $174,075 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOU…PHILLIPS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherPHILLIPS COM…UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - PHILLIPS — $28,000 · OtherUNITED METHO…UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherUNITED METHO…PHILLIPS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · OtherAURORA HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · OtherTHE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME — $5,000 · OtherHAMILTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $12,000 · Food & NutritionHENDERSON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $2,500 · Human Services
Education$595,000Philanthropy$174,075Other$100,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $174,075 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $140,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $12,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetPHILLIPS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetHASTINGS SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann FoundationNE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann Foundation · Hamilton Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Heuermann Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heuermann Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Heuermann Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph