Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hester Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$144kArts & Culture$128kHealth$110kYouth Development$94kRecreation & Sports$43kSocial Science$33kHuman Services$25kPhilanthropy$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GNOSTIC INSTITUTE$15,000
SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS$12,780
HOOVER INSTITUTE$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN$5,000
DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$5,000
CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION$3,500
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $6k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $5k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $3k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $700 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$592k · 16 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$592k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-47%

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +127%
  • SC
    Segerstrom Center for the Arts
    9× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +57%
  • DA
    DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • U
    UCI
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • HC
    HOAG COVID 19 SUPPORT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF EUREKA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Queen of the Valley Medical Center

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
2
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

To restore, sustain and enhance the health and developmental potential of children through excellence in care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
3
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
4
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
5
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
11
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
12
Providence Speech and Hearing Center

To continually provide the highest standards of services in the identification, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of speech, language and hearing disorders for persons of all ages, races and socio-economic backgrounds.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital of Orange County; the most unlike its peers is The Relational Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GNOSTIC INSTITUTE: $102,000 · OtherGNOSTIC INSTITUTEUCI: $100,000 · OtherUCITRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $41,500 · OtherTRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $35,200 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC: $34,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OCHOOVER INSTITUTE: $32,500 · OtherHOOVER INSTITUTESPECIAL OLYMPICS OF OC: $30,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF OC+9 more: $60,100 · Other+9 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $85,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HO…+1 more: $2,500 · HealthSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $83,574 · Arts & CultureSegerstrom Ce…DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $44,000 · Human ServicesDECORATIVE…CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $24,625 · Human ServicesCORAZON DE…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Relational Center: $14,850 · Philanthropy
Other$435,300Health$87,500Arts & Culture$83,574Human Services$68,625Youth Development$25,000Philanthropy$14,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $83,574 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $44,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $24,625 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetThe Relational Center: $14,850 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF EUREKA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Relational Center ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF EUREKA ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hester Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hester Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hester Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph