Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hershman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$286k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MReligion$953kEducation$124kArts & Culture$25kInternational$15kPhilanthropy$13kHealth$8kSocial Science$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$673k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 95% of reported assets are held in Citigroup Global Markets.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YAD CHAYA$80,000
Individual grant recipient$28,000
CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH LETORAH$28,000
Individual grant recipient$26,000
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$15,450
NER L'HOREINU INC$12,500
HACHAIM VEHASHALOM$10,360
NER L'HOREINU INC FAMILY FUND$10,000
DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC$10,000
CONGREGATION KEREN HAGEMACH$10,000
SIMCHAT TZION$9,000
CONGREGATION AISH KODESH$6,350
AISH KODESH$5,300
KEREN ZICHRON GEDALYAHU$5,000
SHOR YOSHOV INSTITUTE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YAD CHAYA: $230k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $150k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $130k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $120k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $110k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $110k → 13%YAD CHAYA INC: $100k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $80k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $60k → 13%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10k → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $225 → 6%THE MARION & AARON GURAL JCC: $5k → 6%MARION & AARON GURAL JCC: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MD
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 30 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +287% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
40

Total granted

$2.0M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+287%
+35%

Still filing today

23%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YAD CHAYA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +287%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $36k · revenue +395%
  • CY
    CHASDEI YISROEL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHAZAK VEMATZ CONGREGATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TIFERES YISROEL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -5%
  • KN
    KOLLEL NER NAFTALI
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Ner Yaakov Inc

To provide financial support for organizations of talmudic study and advanced torah learning. assitance includes providing food and other needs to the students of advance talmudic studying and advanced torah learning

—
2
American Friends of Ner Yisroel Inc

To award grants to jewish religious institutions and individuals.

Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
4
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
7
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
8
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
9
American Friends of Yad Eliezer-Bei Shemesh

Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.

Philanthropy
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
12
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Leon Mayer Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA KETANA OF MANHATTAN: $250,800 · OtherYESHIVA KETANA OF MANHATTANSIMCHAT TZION: $171,300 · OtherSIMCHAT TZIONNER LOREINU INC: $76,980 · OtherNER LOREINU INCCONGREGATION AISH KODESH: $68,825 · OtherCONGREGATION AISH KODESHBETH JACOB SCHOOL OF LOWER EAST SIDE: $67,500 · OtherBETH JACOB SCHOOL OF LOWER EAST SIDEHACHAIM VEHASHALOM INC: $56,360 · OtherSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INC: $49,005 · Other+61 more: $371,675 · Other+61 moreYAD CHAYA INC: $1,090,000 · Human ServicesYAD CHAYA INC+3 more: $16,225 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC: $36,000 · Education+1 more: $360 · EducationKOLLEL NER NAFTALI: $12,600 · ReligionNER L HOREINU INC: $12,500 · ReligionYESHIVAS REB CHAIM OZER INC: $5,000 · ReligionNESS 26 INC: $3,260 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TIFERES YISROEL: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $10,000 · InternationalEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $2,460 · InternationalBrothers for Life: $15,450 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $6,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,112,445Human Services$1,106,225Education$36,360Religion$34,360International$32,460Arts & Culture$24,450Philanthropy$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $1,090,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC: $36,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TIFERES YISROEL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARION AND AARON GURAL JCC INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS REB CHAIM OZER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $2,460 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAZ HOUSE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $756 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TIFERES YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL NER NAFTALI ↗
  • Who funds NER L HOREINU INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARION AND AARON GURAL JCC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY43× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The J W Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · F G Foundation · The Ezra Charitable Trust · The Basch Family Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Fjc · Royal Heritage Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hershman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hershman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hershman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph