Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herbert M Zahl Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$133kAnimals$58kHousing & Shelter$39kEducation$23kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$17kCrime & Legal$15kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$804k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REBUILDING TOGETHER$7,400
Individual grant recipient$7,400
FRIENDS OF THE CHINOOK SCHOOL$4,000
OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK$4,000
HIS SUPPER TABLE$4,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL$4,000
ILWACO HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $4k → 5%FOOD BACKPACKS FOR KIDS: $8k → 9%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $4k → 5%SOCITY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $4k → 5%PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE: $5k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHINOOK SCHOOL: $4k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHINOOK SCHOOL: $4k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHINOOK SCHOOL: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$274k · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$274k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+126%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HIS SUPPER TABLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +45%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $39k · revenue +35%
  • OP
    OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +316%
  • PP
    PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPRgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +126%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cumby Food Pantry

food pantry

Food & Nutrition
2
Heart of Putnam Food Pantry Inc Sharing Putnams Bounty

Providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
3
Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health
4
3G Food Pantry

Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
5
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Mpc Rescue

helping homeless with auppling them with supplies to help them

Human Services
7
The Lords Table a Ministry of Rccg

Food Pantry for the Community to provide food and other household items, including back to school items for Kids.

Religion
8
Waste Not Want Not Community Kitchen Inc

Using community resources such as volunteer labor, donated foods, goods and money, the group provides a wholesome free meal once a week to those in need. WNWN also provides emergency food and necessities during the rest of the week as…

—
9
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Food Basket

The Organization provides food and material assistance at no cost to persons or families who are unable to provide for their own needs.

Food & Nutrition
11
Emergency Community Food Pantry

To provide food to those in need due to emergency situations.

Food & Nutrition
12
St Helena Community Food Pantry

Local area distribution of both perishable and non-perishable food to low income households by community volunteers.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Backpacks 4 Kids; the most unlike its peers is Ilwaco Heritage Foundation Columbia Pacific Heritage Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $52,493 · OtherIndividual grant recipientILWACO HIGH SCHOOL: $19,200 · OtherILWACO HIGH SCHOOLILWACO FOOD BANK: $17,980 · OtherILWACO FOOD BANKCHINOOK FOOD PANTRY INC: $17,980 · OtherCHINOOK FOOD PANTRY INCCOLUMBIA PACIFIC HERITAGE MUSEUM: $14,300 · OtherCOLUMBIA PACIFIC HERITAGE MUSEUMHUMANE SOCIETY: $5,300 · Other+8 more: $21,433 · Other+8 moreHIS SUPPER TABLE: $45,730 · Food & NutritionHIS SUPPER TABLEOCEAN PARK FOOD BANK: $29,930 · Food & NutritionOCEAN PARK FOOD BANKThe Community Table Inc: $6,800 · Food & NutritionThe Community Table IncREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY: $38,800 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TO…SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS: $11,950 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST…Friends of Chinook School: $11,950 · Human ServicesFriends of Ch…FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $7,500 · Human ServicesFOOD BACKPACK…PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR: $5,300 · Human ServicesPENINSULA POV…BACK PACK FOR KIDS: $4,633 · PhilanthropyCAMP VICTORY: $3,000 · Crime & LegalILWACO HERITAGE FOUNDATION COLUMBIA PACIFIC HERITAGE MUSEUM: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$148,686Food & Nutrition$82,460Housing & Shelter$38,800Human Services$36,700Philanthropy$4,633Crime & Legal$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIS SUPPER TABLE: $45,730 over 9y, 12% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY: $38,800 over 5y, 16% of budgetOCEAN PARK FOOD BANK: $29,930 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS: $11,950 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFriends of Chinook School: $11,950 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetFOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCAMP VICTORY: $3,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetILWACO HERITAGE FOUNDATION COLUMBIA PACIFIC HERITAGE MUSEUM: $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIS SUPPER TABLE ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN PARK FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Chinook School ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS ↗
  • Who funds The Community Table Inc ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA POVERTY RESPONSE PPR ↗
  • Who funds BACK PACK FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP VICTORY ↗
  • Who funds ILWACO HERITAGE FOUNDATION COLUMBIA PACIFIC HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Templin FoundationWA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Templin Foundation · South Pacific County Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert M Zahl Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert M Zahl Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herbert M Zahl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph