Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herb Waltermire Comm Enhancement Fndt Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$185kHuman Services$69kEducation$65kArts & Culture$63kRecreation & Sports$37kHousing & Shelter$27kFood & Nutrition$15kHealth$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
$5,087
Median grant
1
States reached
$872k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEACE PLACE$13,338
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CASCADE$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF HELENA$10,000
HEISEY YOUTH CENTER$10,000
KAIROS YOUTH SERVICES$5,087
CASA CAN CHILDREN'S ADVOCATE NETWORK$5,000
FARMER IN THE DELL OF GREAT FALLS$5,000
ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH$5,000
LEWIS AND CLARK FOUNDATION$4,600
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $6k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $13k → 14%PEACE PLACE: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Herb Waltermire Comm Enhancement Fndt Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MT; by stated purpose, 90%.

Herb Waltermire Comm Enhancement Fndt Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$399k · 18 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
15

Total granted

$399k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+38%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING
    3× · 2017–2019 · $57k · revenue +13%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +102%
  • LC
    LEWIS & CLARK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF BIG SKY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • OI
    OPPORTUNITIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -6%
  • CC
    CASCADE COUNTY JUVENILE DRUG COURT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Greater Montana Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Great Falls Rescue Mission

A christian organization committed to caring for the hungry, hurting, and homeless of north central montana.

Human Services
4
Great Falls Children's Receiving Home

It is the mission of the great falls children's receiving home to provide a temporary home for abandoned, abused, neglected and homeless children. the receiving home will provide shelter, food, clothing, warmth, love and understanding. it…

Human Services
5
Great Falls Clinic Legacy Foundation

The great falls clinic legacy foundation brings hope and healing to great falls and surrounding communities

Health
6
Mountain Home Montana Inc

To provide a safe, stable , and nurturing home where young mothers can discover their strengths, and their children can experience the joys of childhood.

Human Services
7
Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc

Family promise of gallatin valley in montana is a non-profit organization working with our community to develop comprehensive, holistic solutions for families facing homelessness. we provide prevention services before families reach a…

Human Services
8
Central Montana Childcare Alliance

Partner with childcare providers, families, and stakeholders to improve the quality of programming and expand the availability of childcare options in central montana.

Human Services
9
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
10
Friends of the Children - Montana

Friends of the children montana has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Youth Development
11
Center for Restorative Youth Justice

The center for restorative youth justice (cryj) works to actively engage youth, victimes, families, communities in restorative programming that interrupts cycles of harm. our programs create opportunities for at-risk youth to deepen…

Human Services
12
Partnership for Children

To provide therapeutic care and support for the safe and healthy development of children and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Montana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kairos Youth Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEISEY YOUTH CENTER: $40,000 · OtherHEISEY YOUTH CENTERBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CASCADE: $35,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CASCADEBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF HELENA: $30,400 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF HELENAIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST PRESBYERIAN CHURCH - PEACE PLACE RESPITE CARE: $19,020 · OtherFIRST PRESBYERIAN CHURCH - PEACE PLACE RESPITE CAREMONTANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $15,000 · OtherMONTANA MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MONTANA INC: $11,250 · OtherFARMER IN THE DELL OF GREAT FALLS: $10,150 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF BIG SKY COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherMT SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $65,925 · Other+17 moreGIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING: $56,590 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS O…SPARK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MONTANA INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSPARK CHI…PEACE PLACE: $19,338 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITIES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesKAIROS YOUTH SERVICES: $5,087 · Human ServicesLEWIS & CLARK FOUNDATION: $17,100 · PhilanthropyGREAT FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS: $27,113 · ReligionGREAT FALLS COMMUNITY ICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$289,245Youth Development$56,590Arts & Culture$40,000Human Services$30,425Philanthropy$28,100Religion$27,113Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING: $56,590 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSPARK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MONTANA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS: $27,113 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetPEACE PLACE: $19,338 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK FOUNDATION: $17,100 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MONTANA INC: $11,250 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGREAT FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAIROS YOUTH SERVICES: $5,087 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREAT FALLS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT FALLS COMMUNITY ICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCASA OF CASCADE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds SPARK CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS ↗
  • Who funds PEACE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KAIROS YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS COMMUNITY ICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF CASCADE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montana Community Foundation IncMT19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Alice Lee Lund Charitable Trust · United Way of Cascade County · Zeller-Knowles Foundation Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Oakland Family Foundation · Boe Brothers Foundation D a Davidson Trust Co · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herb Waltermire Comm Enhancement Fndt Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herb Waltermire Comm Enhancement Fndt Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herb Waltermire Comm Enhancement Fndt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph